Attention to hierarchical level influences attentional selection of spatial scale.

Ample evidence suggests that global perception may involve low spatial frequency (LSF) processing and that local perception may involve high spatial frequency (HSF) processing (Shulman, Sullivan, Gish, & Sakoda, 1986; Shulman & Wilson, 1987; Robertson, 1996). It is debated whether SF selection is a low-level mechanism associating global and local information with absolute LSF and HSF content, or whether it is a higher level mechanism involving a selective process that defines the SF range in which global and local can then be relatively defined. The present study provides support for the latter claim by demonstrating that allocating attention to global or local levels of hierarchical displays biased selection of LSFs or HSFs, respectively, in subsequently presented compound gratings. This bias occurred despite a change in the response dimension (from letter identification in the hierarchical stimulus to orientation discrimination in the grating) and despite a difference in retinal location of the hierarchical stimuli and the grating stimulus. Moreover, the bias was determined by the relationship between the 2 SFs in the compound grating (i.e., their relative frequency) rather than the absolute SF values.

[1]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention to hierarchical level influences attentional selection of spatial scale , 2010 .

[2]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  E. Yund,et al.  Interactions between spatial attention and global/local feature selection: an ERP study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[4]  E W Yund,et al.  Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[7]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M G Woldorff,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[10]  G. Mangun,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in Global/Local Processing: Effects of Stimulus Position and Spatial Frequency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[14]  A. Hyvärinen,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning in human retinotopic visual areas. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries , 2000, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[16]  S. Han,et al.  Processing of global and local properties--an analysis with event-related brain potentials. , 1996, Science in China. Series C, Life sciences.

[17]  H. Heinze,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  L. Robertson,et al.  Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Spatial frequencies as a medium for guiding attention: comment on Lamb, Yund, and Pond (1999) , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Neural coding of global form in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[29]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  ‘Part-whole’ processing in unilateral brain- damaged patients: Dysfunction of hierarchical organization , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[32]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.