A comparison of stavudine plus lamivudine versus zidovudine plus lamivudine in combination with indinavir in antiretroviral naive individuals with HIV infection: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START I)

BackgroundNo clinical trial results directly comparing two nucleoside analog pairs in a drug regimen for HIV that includes a protease inhibitor are available. ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of stavudine (d4T) + lamivudine (3TC) with zidovudine (ZDV) + 3TC, each in combination with indinavir (IDV). DesignRandomized, open-label, multi-center. SettingFifteen HIV clinical research centers. PatientsTwo-hundred and four antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected-patients with CD4 cell counts ⩾ 200 × 106/l and HIV-1 RNA ⩾ 10 000 copies/ml (bDNA assay), modified to 5000 copies/ml. Interventiond4T 40 mg twice a day, 3TC 150 mg twice a day plus IDV 800 mg every 8 h compared with ZDV 200 mg every 8 h (modified to 300 mg every 12 h) plus 3TC and IDV. MeasurementsPrimary endpoint: plasma HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml. Additional endpoints: HIV-1 RNA ⩽ 50 copies/ml; change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts; safety and adverse events. ResultsFor HIV-1 RNA, 62% of patients on d4T + 3TC + IDV and 54% of patients on ZDV + 3TC + IDV had < 500 copies/ml HIV RNA at weeks 40 through 48 [90% confidence interval, −0.204 to 0.036;P = 0.213], with 49% and 47% respectively achieving ⩽ 50 copies/ml at 48 weeks (90% CI, −0.134 to 0.096;P = 0.834). Median change in CD4 cell counts at 48 weeks was + 227 × 106/l and + 198 × 106/l for the d4T- and ZDV-containing arms, respectively. The median time-weighted average change from baseline in CD4 cell counts was significantly greater at 48 weeks in the d4T-containing arm (142 × 106/l versus 110 × 106/l;P = 0.033). Serious adverse events were not significantly different between treatment arms, but there were significant differences for frequency of adverse events of all severity with increased nausea and vomiting in the ZDV-containing arm, and increased diarrhea and rash in the d4T-containing arm. ConclusionsThese results support the choice of d4T + 3TC as a nucleoside analog pair in combination with a protease inhibitor in an initial HIV treatment regimen.

[1]  M. Hirsch,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. , 1999, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  R. Chaisson,et al.  Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Urban Clinic: Risk Factors for Virologic Failure and Adverse Drug Reactions , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  C. Pettinelli,et al.  Lamivudine in combination with zidovudine, stavudine, or didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 306 Investigators. , 1999, AIDS.

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Maintenance antiretroviral therapies in HIV-infected subjects with undetectable plasma HIV RNA after triple-drug therapy. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 343 Team. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  V. Calvez,et al.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Stavudine plus Lamivudine in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Patients with HIV-1 Infection , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  D. Richman,et al.  Simultaneous vs sequential initiation of therapy with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine for HIV-1 infection: 100-week follow-up. , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997. Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  David A. Cooper,et al.  A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors , 1998, AIDS.

[9]  J. J. Henning,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, January 28, 2000 , 1998, HIV clinical trials.

[10]  J. Leonard,et al.  The duration of viral suppression during protease inhibitor therapy for HIV‐1 infection is predicted by plasma HIV‐1 RNA at the nadir , 1998, AIDS.

[11]  J. Montaner,et al.  A randomized, double-blind trial comparing combinations of nevirapine, didanosine, and zidovudine for HIV-infected patients: the INCAS Trial. Italy, The Netherlands, Canada and Australia Study. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  D. Richman,et al.  Recovery of replication-competent HIV despite prolonged suppression of plasma viremia. , 1997, Science.

[13]  R Brookmeyer,et al.  Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. , 1997, Science.

[14]  E A Emini,et al.  Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M A Fischl,et al.  A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1998: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. , 1997, JAMA.

[17]  S. Hammer,et al.  The relation of virologic and immunologic markers to clinical outcomes after nucleoside therapy in HIV-infected adults with 200 to 500 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Virology Study Team. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Hammer,et al.  A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J. Kahn,et al.  Association of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA level with risk of clinical progression in patients with advanced infection. AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 116B/117 Study Team. ACTG Virology Committee Resistance and HIV-1 RNA Working Groups. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  J. Kahn,et al.  Prognostic value of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels in patients with advanced HIV-1 disease and with little or no prior zidovudine therapy , 1996 .

[21]  J. Darbyshire,et al.  Delta: a randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing combinations of zidovudine plus didanosine or zalcitabine with zidovudine alone in HIV-infected individuals , 1996, The Lancet.

[22]  P. Hartigan,et al.  Changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ lymphocyte counts and the risk of progression to AIDS. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on AIDS. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Hui Li,et al.  Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients on prolonged stavudine therapy. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[24]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[25]  S. Hammer,et al.  Use of changes in plasma levels of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA to assess the clinical benefit of antiretroviral therapy. , 1998, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[26]  J. Montaner,et al.  A randomized, double-blind trial comparing combinations of nevirapine, didanosine, and zidovudine for HIV-infected patients: the INCAS Trial. Italy, The Netherlands, Canada and Australia Study. , 1998, JAMA.

[27]  J. Kahn,et al.  Prognostic value of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels in patients with advanced HIV-1 disease and with little or no prior zidovudine therapy. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 116A/116B/117 Team. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.