MEASURING LEARNING IN THE AFFECTIVE DOMAIN USING REFLECTIVE WRITING ABOUT A VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURE EXPERIENCE

Agricultural educators are familiar with the three domains of learning: 1) cognitive, 2) affective, and 3) psychomotor. When teaching agricultural content, the instructional and assessment strategies are typically focused on the cognitive domain of learning because of the difficulty in measuring gains in the affective domain. The purpose of this study was to measure affective learning after viewing an asynchronously delivered simulation, reflecting (metacognition), and writing about the experience. Research in agricultural education is devoid of writing as an assessment tool to measure learning in the affective domain. Content analysis of 83 reflective writing samples was used to analyze affective learning at the levels of receiving, responding, valuing, organization, and characterization. It was evident in the reflective writing that all students participated at the receiving and responding levels. It is much more difficult to assess students at the higher levels of the affective domain (valuing, organizing, and characterizing). From the analysis of reflective writing, the researchers recognized and determined that some students expressed affective learning at higher levels of the affective taxonomy and increased their level of reflective writing in the process.

[1]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[2]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[3]  James A. Davis,et al.  Research Methods in Social Relations , 1952 .

[4]  J. Cano The Relationship Between Instruction And Student Performance At The Various Levels Of Cognition Among Selected Ohio Production Agriculture Programs , 1990 .

[5]  G. Bower Mood and memory. , 1981, The American psychologist.

[6]  I. Hodder The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture , 1994 .

[7]  Rebecca A. Litke Do All Students "Get It?": Comparing Students' Reflections to Course Performance. , 2002 .

[8]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[9]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[10]  Roy M. Bohlin The Affective Domain: A Model of Learner-Instruction Interactions. , 1998 .

[11]  R. Bruning Cognitive Psychology and Instruction , 1998 .

[12]  Anita J. Harrow A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain : a guidefor developing behavioral objectives / by Anita J. Harrow , 1972 .

[13]  Hans Peter Christensen,et al.  Developing critical reflection as a part of teaching training and teaching practice , 2001 .

[14]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Emotional influences in memory and thinking: Data and theory , 1982 .

[15]  Jann E. Freed,et al.  Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning , 1999 .

[16]  N. Hatton,et al.  Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation , 1995 .

[17]  D. Kember,et al.  Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[19]  Mark Abrahamson,et al.  Social research methods , 1983 .

[20]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division (20th, St. Louis, Missouri, February 18-22, 1998). , 1998 .

[21]  Mercury Thermometers Motivation : A , 2005 .

[22]  G. Bower Affect and Cognition , 1983, A Configuration Approach to Mindset Agency Theory.

[23]  J. Emig Writing as a Mode of Learning. , 1977 .

[24]  T. Bastick,et al.  Intuition--how we think and act , 1982 .

[25]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[26]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[27]  David Kember,et al.  Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow , 1999 .

[28]  M. Rokeach,et al.  Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. A Theory of Organization and Change , 1968 .

[29]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[30]  AUTHENTICATED WRITING COMPETENCIES OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION GRADUATE STUDENTS: A COMPARISON OF DISTANCE AND ON-CAMPUS STUDENTS , 2005 .

[31]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[32]  Don Kuiken Mood and memory : theory, research, and applications , 1991 .

[33]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Psychology in America's Bicentennial Year , 1976 .

[34]  Colin Sharp Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[35]  Matt R. Raven,et al.  The Effects of World Wide Web Instruction and Traditional Instruction and Learning Styles on Achievement and Changes in Student Attitudes in a Technical Writing in Agricommunication Course , 1998 .

[36]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[37]  Jamie Cano,et al.  Cognitive Level Of Instruction And Student Performance Among Selected Ohio Production Agriculture Programs , 1990 .

[38]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[39]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .