Predicting yields of short-rotation hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) for the United States through model-data synthesis.

Hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) is an important biomass crop being evaluated for cellulosic ethanol production. Predictions of poplar growth, rotation period, and soil carbon sequestration under various growing conditions, soils, and climates are critical for farmers and managers planning to establish short-rotation forestry (SRF) plantations. In this study, we used an ecoinformatics workflow, the Predictive Ecosystem Analyzer (PEcAn), to integrate literature data and field measurements into the Ecosystem Demography 2 (ED2) model to estimate yield potential of poplar plantations. Within PEcAn 164 records of seven different traits from the literature were assimilated using a Bayesian meta-analysis. Next, variance decomposition identified seven variables for further constraint that contributed > 80% to the uncertainty in modeled yields: growth respiration, dark respiration, quantum efficiency, mortality coefficient, water conductance, fine-root allocation, and root turnover rate. Assimilation of observed yields further constrained uncertainty in model parameters (especially dark respiration and root turnover rate) and biomass estimates. Additional measurements of growth respiration, mortality, water conductance, and quantum efficiency would provide the most efficient path toward further constraint of modeled yields. Modeled validation demonstrated that ED2 successfully captured the interannual and spatial variability of poplar yield observed at nine independent sites. Site-level analyses were conducted to estimate the effect of land use change to SRF poplar on soil C sequestration compared to alternate land uses. These suggest that poplar plantations became a C sink within 18 years of conversion from corn production or existing forest. Finally, poplar yields were estimated for the contiguous United States at a half degree resolution in order to determine potential productivity, estimate the optimal rotation period, and compare poplar to perennial grass yields. This regional projection suggests that poplar yield varies considerably with differences in soil and climate, reaching as much as 18 Mg x ha(-1) x yr(-1) in eastern, southern, and northwest regions. In New England, the upper Midwest, and northern California, yields are predicted to exceed those of the highly productive C4 perennial grass, Miscanthus. In these poplar-productive regions, 4-11 year rotations give the highest potential yields. In conclusion, poplar plantations are predicted to have a high yield potential across a wide range of climates and soils and could be sustainable in soil C sequestration.

[1]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  Facilitating feedbacks between field measurements and ecosystem models , 2013 .

[2]  M. Dietze,et al.  Impact of nitrogen allocation on growth and photosynthesis of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) , 2012 .

[3]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States , 2012 .

[4]  W. Parton,et al.  Harvesting Carbon from Eastern US Forests: Opportunities and Impacts of an Expanding Bioenergy Industry , 2012 .

[5]  David Medvigy,et al.  Predicting ecosystem dynamics at regional scales: an evaluation of a terrestrial biosphere model for the forests of northeastern North America , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  E. Bonari,et al.  Impact on soil quality of a 10-year-old short-rotation coppice poplar stand compared with intensive agricultural and uncultivated systems in a Mediterranean area , 2011 .

[7]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Review and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar , 2011 .

[8]  Chris Somerville,et al.  Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels , 2010, Science.

[9]  A. Halvorson,et al.  Production of hybrid poplar under short-term, intensive culture in Western Colorado , 2010 .

[10]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Response and potential of agroforestry crops under global change. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[11]  D. Wa A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors , 2010 .

[12]  M. McGlone,et al.  Comparative biogeography of New Zealand trees: species richness, height, leaf traits and range sizes , 2010 .

[13]  A. Talhelm,et al.  Species-specific responses to atmospheric carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone mediate changes in soil carbon. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[14]  Qianlai Zhuang,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis and Bayesian inference framework for improving the parameter estimation and prediction of a process-based Terrestrial Ecosystem Model , 2009 .

[15]  Li Zhang,et al.  Parameter identifiability, constraint, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2 , 2009 .

[17]  K. Heinsoo,et al.  Fine root biomass and production in a Salix viminalis and Salix dasyclados plantation. , 2009 .

[18]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Biomass production physiology and soil carbon dynamics in short-rotation-grown Populus deltoides and P. deltoides × P. nigra hybrids , 2009 .

[19]  B. Konôpka,et al.  Carbon allocation in forest ecosystem - case studies from young pine stands , 2009 .

[20]  S. Davis,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops , 2008 .

[21]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[22]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Meta-analysis of the effects of management factors on Miscanthus × giganteus growth and biomass production , 2008 .

[23]  Ian Shield,et al.  Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[24]  M. Coleman,et al.  Above- and below-ground biomass accumulation, production, and distribution of sweetgum and loblolly pine grown with irrigation and fertilization , 2008 .

[25]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[26]  J. Skillman Quantum yield variation across the three pathways of photosynthesis: not yet out of the dark. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  Raymond O. Miller,et al.  Growth and yield of poplar and willow hybrids in the central Upper Peninsula of Michigan , 2008 .

[28]  Michael Wang,et al.  The Advanced Energy Initiative , 2007 .

[29]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems , 2007 .

[30]  Raoul Lemeur,et al.  Short-rotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in Flanders (Belgium) I—Biomass production after 4 years of tree growth , 2007 .

[31]  D. Markewitz,et al.  Soil carbon storage and nitrogen and phosphorous availability in loblolly pine plantations over 4 to16 years of herbicide and fertilizer treatments , 2007 .

[32]  K. Davis,et al.  Regional carbon fluxes from an observationally constrained dynamic ecosystem model: Impacts of disturbance, CO2 fertilization, and heterogeneous land cover , 2007 .

[33]  A. Schrijver,et al.  Nutrient cycling in a poplar plantation (Populus trichocarpa x Populus deltoides 'Beaupré') on former agricultural land in northern Belgium , 2007 .

[34]  G. Hurtt,et al.  The contributions of land‐use change, CO2 fertilization, and climate variability to the Eastern US carbon sink , 2006 .

[35]  R. Lal,et al.  Potential Soil Carbon Sequestration and CO2 Offset by Dedicated Energy Crops in the USA , 2006 .

[36]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  A. Faaij,et al.  The economic value of the phytoremediation function – Assessed by the example of cadmium remediation by willow (Salix ssp) , 2006 .

[38]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[39]  S. Trumbore Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges , 2006 .

[40]  D. Mead Opportunities for improving plantation productivity. How much? How quickly? How realistic? , 2005 .

[41]  B. Law,et al.  An improved analysis of forest carbon dynamics using data assimilation , 2005 .

[42]  P. Reich,et al.  Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[44]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security , 2004, Science.

[45]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Beyond potential vegetation: Combining lidar data and a height-structured model for carbon studies , 2004 .

[46]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[47]  V. R. Tolbert,et al.  Comparing Soil Carbon of Short Rotation Poplar Plantations with Agricultural Crops and Woodlots in North Central United States , 2004 .

[48]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[49]  R. Norby,et al.  Fine-root respiration in a loblolly pine and sweetgum forest growing in elevated CO2. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[50]  Christian P. Giardina,et al.  Reduction of soil carbon formation by tropospheric ozone under increased carbon dioxide levels , 2003, Nature.

[51]  Wilhelm Claupein,et al.  Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use - a review of the physiological basis and management influences. , 2003 .

[52]  R. Gifford,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis , 2002 .

[53]  David N. Tolsted,et al.  Growth, yield, and disease resistance of 7- to 12-year-old poplar clones in the north central United States. , 2002 .

[54]  S. Pacala,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2001 .

[55]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Short rotation coppice tree species selection for woody biomass production in New Zealand , 2001 .

[56]  Gregg Marland,et al.  THE POTENTIAL OF BIOMASS FUELS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE: Focus on Transportation Fuels , 2000 .

[57]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[58]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Emerging Model Systems in Plant Biology: Poplar (Populus) as A Model Forest Tree , 2000, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[59]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems , 2000 .

[60]  J. Amthor The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley Respiration Paradigms: 30 Years Later , 2000 .

[61]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Coupled Atmosphere–Biophysics–Hydrology Models for Environmental Modeling , 2000 .

[62]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Environmental Review: Ecoregions: A Geographic Framework to Guide Risk Characterization and Ecosystem Management , 1999 .

[63]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. I. Site–growth relationships , 1999 .

[64]  D. Binkley,et al.  CHANGES IN SOIL CARBON FOLLOWING AFFORESTATION IN HAWAII , 1998 .

[65]  M. Williams,et al.  Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? , 1998, Tree physiology.

[66]  A. Nardini,et al.  Root hydraulic conductance of six forest trees: possible adaptive significance of seasonal changes , 1998 .

[67]  M. Ter-Mikaelian,et al.  Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species , 1997 .

[68]  S. Trumbore,et al.  Potential responses of soil organic carbon to global environmental change. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  C. Harrington,et al.  Productivity of Populus in monoclonal and polyclonal blocks at three spacings , 1997 .

[70]  G. Host,et al.  Modeling the effects of climatic extremes on early growth of poplar under short rotation intensive culture. , 1997 .

[71]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Carbon acquisition and allocation , 1996 .

[72]  R. Leuning A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[73]  F. Makeschin Effects of energy forestry on soils , 1994 .

[74]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide , 1993 .

[75]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3 Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/Ci Curves from 109 Species , 1993 .

[76]  E. Hansen Soil carbon sequestration beneath hybrid poplar plantations in the North Central United States , 1993 .

[77]  E. Hansen,et al.  Hybrid poplar spacing/productivity relations in short rotation intensive culture plantations , 1993 .

[78]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[79]  D. Auclair,et al.  Influence of spacing and short rotations on Populus trichocarpa × deltoides coppice , 1992 .

[80]  H. M. Rauscher,et al.  ECOPHYS: An ecophysiological growth process model for juvenile poplar. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[81]  Henrik Eckersten,et al.  Modelling nitrogen turnover and production in an irrigated short-rotation forest , 1990 .

[82]  W. Parton,et al.  Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model , 1988 .

[83]  J. Saldarriaga,et al.  LONG-TERM CHRONOSEQUENCE OF FOREST SUCCESSION IN THE UPPER RIO NEGRO OF COLOMBIA AND VENEZUELA , 1988 .

[84]  J. Omernik Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[85]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis , 1982 .