Formats for Improving Risk Communication in Medical Tradeoff Decisions

ABSTRACT To make treatment decisions, patients should consider not only a treatment option's potential consequences but also the probability of those consequences. Many laypeople, however, have difficulty using probability information. This Internet-based study (2,601 participants) examined a hypothetical medical tradeoff situation in which a treatment would decrease one risk but increase another. Accuracy was assessed in terms of the ability to determine correctly whether the treatment would increase or decrease the total risk. For these tradeoff problems, accuracy was greater when the following occurred: (1) the amount of cognitive effort required to evaluate the tradeoff was reduced; (2) probability information was presented as a graphical display rather than as text only; and (3) information was presented as percentages rather than as frequencies (n in 100). These findings provide suggestions of ways to present risk probabilities that may help patients understand their treatment options.

[1]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[2]  David K. Simkin,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .

[3]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[4]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Displaying proportions and percentages , 1991 .

[5]  J G Hollands,et al.  Judgments of Change and Proportion in Graphical Perception , 1992, Human factors.

[6]  M. J. Quadrel,et al.  Risk perception and communication , 2008 .

[7]  B G Coury,et al.  Incorporating the effect of display formats in cognitive modelling. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[8]  P M Sandman,et al.  Testing a visual display to explain small probabilities. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  S. Epstein,et al.  The Generality of the Ratio-Bias Phenomenon , 1995 .

[10]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[11]  R F Nease,et al.  Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  Priscilla M. Regan,et al.  Risk Versus Risk: Tradeoffs in Protecting Health and the Environment, John D. Graham and Jonathan Baert Wiener, Editors. 1995. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 320 pages. ISBN: 0-674-77304-7. $39.95 , 1997 .

[13]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Communicating Low Risk Magnitudes: Incidence Rates Expressed as Frequency Versus Rates Expressed as Probability , 1997 .

[14]  Eric R. Stone,et al.  Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. , 1997 .

[15]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Kimihiko Yamagishi.  When a 12.86% Mortality is More Dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for Risk Communication , 1997 .

[17]  N A Connelly,et al.  Evaluating Risk Communication: Examining Target Audience Perceptions About Four Presentation Formats for Fish Consumption Health Advisory Information , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  The visual communication of risk. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[19]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study , 1999, BMJ.

[20]  M H Gail,et al.  Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  P. Slovic,et al.  Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[22]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  Validity of Web-Based Psychological Research , 2000 .

[23]  Nancy L. Kocovski,et al.  Perception of Quantitative Information for Treatment Decisions , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[24]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  J. Epstein,et al.  Insuring sample equivalence across internet and paper-and-pencil assessments , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  P. Ganz.  Impact of tamoxifen adjuvant therapy on symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[27]  D. Panidis,et al.  Hormone replacement therapy at the threshold of 21st century. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[28]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[29]  Gary L. Brase.  Which Statistical Formats Facilitate What Decisions? The Perception and Influence of Different Statistical Information Formats , 2002 .

[30]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.