Heritability of Face Shape in Twins: A Preliminary Study using 3D Stereophotogrammetry and Geometric Morphometrics.

INTRODUCTION Previous research suggests that aspects of facial surface morphology are heritable. Traditionally, heritability studies have used a limited set of linear distances to quantify facial morphology and often employ statistical methods poorly designed to deal with biological shape. In this preliminary report, we use a combination of 3D photogrammetry and landmark-based morphometrics to explore which aspects of face shape show the strongest evidence of heritability in a sample of twins. METHODS 3D surface images were obtained from 21 twin pairs (10 monozygotic, 11 same-sex dizygotic). Thirteen 3D landmarks were collected from each facial surface and their coordinates subjected to geometric morphometric analysis. This involved superimposing the individual landmark configurations and then subjecting the resulting shape coordinates to a principal components analysis. The resulting PC scores were then used to calculate rough narrow-sense heritability estimates. RESULTS Three principal components displayed evidence of moderate to high heritability and were associated with variation in the breadth of orbital and nasal structures, upper lip height and projection, and the vertical and forward projection of the root of the nose due to variation in the position of nasion. CONCLUSIONS Aspects of facial shape, primarily related to variation in length and breadth of central midfacial structures, were shown to demonstrate evidence of strong heritability. An improved understanding of which facial features are under strong genetic control is an important step in the identification of specific genes that underlie normal facial variation.

[1]  J. Ganger,et al.  Pittsburgh Registry of Infant Multiplets (PRIM). , 2002, Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[2]  I. Nishimura,et al.  A Genome Segment on Mouse Chromosome 12 Determines Maxillary Growth , 2007, Journal of dental research.

[3]  P. J. Byard,et al.  Family resemblance for cranio-facial measurements in Velanti Brahmins from Andhra Pradesh, India. , 1984, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  M. Breen,et al.  Canine TCOF1; cloning, chromosome assignment and genetic analysis in dogs with different head types , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[5]  W. Nance,et al.  Multivariate analysis of craniofacial measurements in twin and family data. , 1974, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  Jonathan Scott Friedlaender,et al.  Heritability of Anthropometric Phenotypes in Caste Populations of Visakhapatnam, India , 2002, Human biology.

[7]  Nicholas J Timpson,et al.  Genome-wide association study of three-dimensional facial morphology identifies a variant in PAX3 associated with nasion position. , 2012, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  P. J. Byard,et al.  A family study of anthropometric traits in a Punjabi community: I. Introduction and familial correlations. , 1984, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  A F Roche,et al.  Sibling correlations for cranial measurements from serial radiographs. , 1984, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[10]  Chung How Kau,et al.  Measuring adult facial morphology in three dimensions. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  P. J. Byard,et al.  Family resemblance for components of craniofacial size and shape. , 1985, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[12]  M. Crawford,et al.  Transmissible and nontransmissible components of anthropometric variation in the Alexanderwohl Mennonites: I. Description and familial correlations. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  R Bibb,et al.  The investigation of the changing facial appearance of identical twins employing a three-dimensional laser imaging system. , 2005, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[14]  M. Crawford,et al.  Transmissible and nontransmissible components of anthropometric variation in the Alexanderwohl Mennonites: II. Resolution by path analysis. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  R. Martina,et al.  Heritability of 39 on MZ, DZ twins orthodontic cephalometric parameters and MN-paired singletons , 1997 .

[16]  Sybill Naidoo,et al.  Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy of Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Comparing the Genex and 3dMD Imaging Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[17]  M. Breen,et al.  The canine homeobox gene MSX2: sequence, chromosome assignment and genetic analysis in dogs of different breeds. , 2001, Animal genetics.

[18]  J. Nadeau,et al.  ENU large-scale mutagenesis and quantitative trait linkage (QTL) analysis in mice: novel technologies for searching polygenetic determinants of craniofacial abnormalities. , 2003, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[19]  G. Willems,et al.  A quantitative genetic study of cephalometric variables in twins. , 2001, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[20]  E. Kobyliansky,et al.  Genetics of human body size and shape: complex segregation analysis. , 1995, Annals of human biology.

[21]  Mauro Santos,et al.  Heritability of human cranial dimensions: comparing the evolvability of different cranial regions , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  E. Demerath,et al.  Quantitative genetics of modern human cranial variation. , 2008, Journal of human evolution.

[23]  R. Nichols,et al.  The diagnosis of twin zygosity. , 1966, Acta genetica et statistica medica.

[24]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[25]  R. Loos,et al.  A genetic study of anteroposterior and vertical facial proportions using model-fitting. , 1998, The Angle orthodontist.

[26]  I. McGonnell,et al.  Characterisation of the genomic canine Fgf8 locus and screen for genetic variants in 4 dogs with different face types , 2007, DNA sequence : the journal of DNA sequencing and mapping.

[27]  Mary L Marazita,et al.  Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Evaluation of Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy Using a Genex 3D Camera System , 2004, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[28]  D. C. Rowe Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived parenting: A twin study. , 1981 .

[29]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. , 2001, Genetics.

[30]  W. Nance,et al.  Genetic determinants of cranio‐facial morphology: a twin study , 1974, Annals of human genetics.

[31]  C. Stringer,et al.  Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[32]  E. Kobyliansky,et al.  Genetic Determination of Head-Size-Related Anthropometric Traits in an Ethnically Homogeneous Sample of 373 Indian Pedigrees of West Bengal , 2007, Human biology.