Multi-layered optimization of demand resources using Lagrange dual decomposition

Summary form only given. This paper concerns mathematical conditions under which a system-level optimization of supply and demand scheduling can be implemented as a distributed optimization in which users and suppliers, as well as the load serving entities, are decision makers with well-defined sub-objectives. We start by defining the optimization problem of the system that includes the sub-objectives of many different players, both supply and demand entities in the system, and decompose the problem into each player's optimization problem, using Lagrange dual decomposition. A demand entity or a load serving entity's problem is further decomposed into problems of the many different end-users that the load serving entity serves. By examining the relationships between the global objectives and the local/individual objectives in these multiple layers and the optimality conditions of these decomposable problems, we define the requirements of these different objectives to converge. We propose a novel set of methods for coordinating supply and demand over different time horizons, namely day-ahead scheduling and real-time adjustment. We illustrate the ideas by simulating simple examples with different conditions and objectives of each entity in the system.

[1]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Current Management in a Hybrid Fuel Cell Power System: A Model-Predictive Control Approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  Jhi-Young Joo,et al.  Efficient Coordination of Wind Power and Price-Responsive Demand—Part I: Theoretical Foundations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Optimization flow control—I: basic algorithm and convergence , 1999, TNET.

[4]  Congcong Wang,et al.  The subgradient-simplex based cutting plane method for convex hull pricing , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[5]  Stephen J. Rassenti,et al.  Chapter 12 The Walrasian Auction , 2008 .

[6]  Eduardo Camponogara,et al.  Distributed model predictive control , 2002 .

[7]  H. Hindi,et al.  Coordinating Regulation and Demand Response in Electric Power Grids: Direct and Price-Based Tracking Using Multirate Economic Model Predictive Control , 2012 .

[8]  Roy Billinton,et al.  A reliability test system for educational purposes-basic distribution system data and results , 1991 .

[9]  H. Uzawa Walras' Tâtonnement in the Theory of Exchange , 1960 .

[10]  Jhi-Young Joo,et al.  A multi-layered adaptive load management (ALM) system: Information exchange between market participants for efficient and reliable energy use , 2010, IEEE PES T&D 2010.

[11]  Panos Constantopoulos,et al.  Estia: A real-time consumer control scheme for space conditioning usage under spot electricity pricing , 1991, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[13]  Philip Haves,et al.  Model predictive control for the operation of building cooling systems , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Message Passing for Dynamic Network Energy Management , 2012, ArXiv.

[15]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Gradient Convergence in Gradient methods with Errors , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[16]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model predictive control: Theory and practice - A survey , 1989, Autom..

[17]  David E. Culler,et al.  Reducing Transient and Steady State Electricity Consumption in HVAC Using Learning-Based Model-Predictive Control , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Decentralized Nodal-Price Self-Dispatch and Unit Commitment , 2002 .

[20]  B. H. Kim,et al.  A comparison of distributed optimal power flow algorithms , 2000 .