Safety and tolerability of a 90‐minute rapid infusion of Sandoz biosimilar rituximab in B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorders in a real‐world setting

Although rituximab is generally well‐tolerated, infusion‐related reactions (IRRs) are common with the initial dose when administered intravenously according to standard recommendations. To prevent IRRs, premedication and low‐speed infusion rates have been recommended. Consequently, intravenous (i.v.) infusion of rituximab can become a labor‐intensive process. Rapid i.v. rituximab infusion over 90 min has demonstrated a favorable safety profile for the second and subsequent infusions during the course of therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of 90‐min rapid infusion of Sandoz rituximab biosimilar (SDZ‐RTX) for patients with CD20+ lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We retrospectively reviewed all patients with CD20+ lymphoma or CLL who received SDZ‐RTX infusions in 90 min from July 2019 to July 2021 at seven Spanish hospitals. The primary end point was the incidence of IRRs. We identified 124 patients and 576 rapid administrations of SDZ‐RTX, with an average of five rapid infusions per patient. Most rapid infusions of SDZ‐RTX were in combination with CHOP/CHOP‐like therapy (48.4%), followed by SDZ‐RTX alone (15.1%), in combination with bendamustine (14.5%), or with other regimens (22%). The 90‐min SDZ‐RTX infusion schedule was well‐tolerated with no grade 3/4 IRRs. The incidence of any grade IRR during the first rapid infusion was 1% (5 grade 1 IRRs and 1 grade 2 IRR). In conclusion, rapid 90‐min i.v. administration of SDZ‐RTX for the second and subsequent infusions during the course of therapy is well‐tolerated in patients with CD20+ lymphoma or CLL.

[1]  A. Salar,et al.  Impact of the subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab and rituximab on efficiency and resource optimization in Spanish hospitals: H-Excelencia study , 2021, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  S. Spila Alegiani,et al.  Safety of switching between rituximab biosimilars in onco-hematology , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[3]  R. Greil,et al.  A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2021, Blood.

[4]  J. Lister,et al.  Rapid rituximab infusion is safe and well tolerated in malignant and benign disease , 2020, Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners.

[5]  A. Salar,et al.  Marginal zone lymphomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  N. Ghosh,et al.  Ibrutinib plus lenalidomide and rituximab has promising activity in relapsed/refractory non-germinal center B-cell DLBCL. , 2019, Blood.

[7]  J. Gribben,et al.  AUGMENT: A Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Lymphoma , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  G. Cartron,et al.  Infusion-related reactions to rituximab: frequency, mechanisms and predictors , 2019, Expert review of clinical immunology.

[9]  T. Kaley,et al.  Rapid infusion rituximab is well tolerated in patients with primary CNS lymphoma , 2018, CNS oncology.

[10]  Marco Montillo,et al.  Venetoclax–Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Rituximab plus bendamustine or chlorambucil for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: primary analysis of the randomized, open-label MABLE study , 2018, Haematologica.

[12]  A. Nobili,et al.  Biological agents and biosimilars: Essential information for the internist. , 2016, European journal of internal medicine.

[13]  T. Waterboer,et al.  Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries , 2016, PloS one.

[14]  Maria Longauer Banholzer,et al.  Clinical development methodology for infusion-related reactions with monoclonal antibodies , 2015, Clinical & translational immunology.

[15]  J. Swan,et al.  Use of a Pharmacy Protocol to Convert Standard Rituximab Infusions to Rapid Infusion Shortens Outpatient Infusion Clinic Visits , 2014, Pharmacotherapy.

[16]  A. Salar,et al.  Comparison of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of rituximab as maintenance treatment for follicular lymphoma: results from a two-stage, phase IB study. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  J. Gribben,et al.  Rituximab plus chlorambucil as first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Final analysis of an open-label phase II study. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  S. Rule,et al.  Subcutaneous vs intravenous rituximab in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a time and motion study in the United Kingdom , 2014, Journal of medical economics.

[19]  F. Merli,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous rituximab in follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): stage 1 analysis of a randomised phase 3 study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  S. Dakhil,et al.  Phase III safety study of rituximab administered as a 90-minute infusion in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma , 2014, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[21]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Rapid Infusion Rituximab for Maintenance Therapy: Is It Feasible? , 2013, Leukemia research and treatment.

[22]  M. Wadhwa,et al.  Biosimilars: what clinicians should know. , 2012, Blood.

[23]  Bhupinder Singh Sekhon,et al.  Biosimilars: an overview , 2011 .

[24]  D. Lang,et al.  Acute adverse reactions of rapid Rituximab infusion among adult patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. , 2011 .

[25]  S. Hee,et al.  A prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and economic benefits of rapid infusion rituximab at an Asian cancer center , 2010, International journal of hematology.

[26]  J. Atmar Review of the safety and feasibility of rapid infusion of rituximab. , 2010, Journal of oncology practice.

[27]  C. Chung Managing premedications and the risk for reactions to infusional monoclonal antibody therapy. , 2008, The oncologist.

[28]  L. Sehn,et al.  Rapid infusion rituximab in combination with corticosteroid-containing chemotherapy or as maintenance therapy is well tolerated and can safely be delivered in the community setting. , 2007, Blood.

[29]  A. Salar,et al.  Rapid infusion of rituximab with or without steroid‐containing chemotherapy: 1‐yr experience in a single institution , 2006, European journal of haematology.

[30]  E. Kimby Tolerability and safety of rituximab (MabThera). , 2005, Cancer treatment reviews.

[31]  J. Preiksaitis New developments in the diagnosis and management of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ transplant recipients. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[32]  I Royston,et al.  IDEC-C2B8 (Rituximab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1997, Blood.