Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence

According to many, we live in an age in which convergence between formerly distinct national `models' is taking place. Central to this process is a learning dynamic in which best practices originating from within one model-Japan in the 1980s, United States in the 1990s-are supposedly adopted by firms elsewhere. This paper addresses two key questions concerning this process. First, what are the actual mechanisms or processes through which this learning-driven convergence might occur? Second, what role do institutions play in shaping, influencing, or constraining firms' choice of practices and their ability to `learn'? The paper examines eight specific channels of convergence representing a continuum of opportunities for learning-through-interacting. It then assesses critically a range of competing arguments about the role of institutional influences at three different scales: the region, the nation-state, and the firm. It concludes that while regional and firm-level arguments, on their own, do not provide an adequate explanatory framework for understanding how firms' practices are determined, national level theory needs to be made supple enough to accommodate a significant role for regional institutions and the agency of the firm. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.

[1]  José Allouche,et al.  Technology management and corporate strategies; a tricontinental perspective , 1995 .

[2]  Harvey Molotch,et al.  The Regional World , 1998 .

[3]  M. Gertler.  Worlds apart: The changing market geography of the German machinery industry , 1996 .

[4]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[5]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[6]  R. Martin,et al.  Slow Convergence? The New Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Development* , 1998 .

[7]  Mary O’Sullivan,et al.  Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany , 2002 .

[8]  K. S. Wever.  Negotiating Competitiveness: Employment Relations and Organizational Innovation in Germany and the United States , 1995 .

[9]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[10]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[12]  E. Schoenberger.  The cultural crisis of the firm , 1997 .

[13]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[14]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question , 1996 .

[15]  G. Hodgson.  Economics and institutions , 1988 .

[16]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[17]  J. Benders,et al.  Leaning on lean: the reception of a management fashion in Germany , 2000 .

[18]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[19]  A. Hayford.  The Limits to Capital , 1984 .

[20]  J. Hollingsworth,et al.  Contemporary capitalism : the embeddedness of institutions , 1997 .

[21]  J. Crump.  Spaces of globalization, reasserting the power of the local , 1998 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[23]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom? , 1999 .

[24]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[25]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[26]  N. Thrift,et al.  Living In The Global , 1994 .

[27]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. , 1995 .

[28]  S. Christopherson.  Rules as resources : How market governance regimes influence firm networks , 2002 .

[29]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[30]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question. The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance , 1996 .

[31]  M. Maurice,et al.  The social foundations of industrial power : a comparison of France and Germany , 1988 .

[32]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. , 1995 .

[33]  R. Cox.  The Retreat of the State? , 1997 .

[34]  The ‘Second Industrial Divide’? The Role of the Large Firm in the Baden-Württemberg Model , 1995 .

[35]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  The Associational Economy , 1998 .

[36]  R. Martin.  The Post-Keynesian State and the Space Economy , 1997 .

[37]  Ronald Dore,et al.  National diversity and global capitalism , 1996 .

[38]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[39]  R. Nelson.  Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change , 2005, Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth.

[40]  Trevor J. Barnes,et al.  The New Industrial Geography : Regions, Regulation and Institutions , 1999 .

[41]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: the limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems , 1998 .

[42]  C. Lane.  The Social Regulation of Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Germany: Market Rules, Legal Norms and Technical Standards , 1997 .

[43]  K. Ohmae,et al.  The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies , 1996 .

[44]  J. Peck.  Work-Place: The Social Regulation of Labor Markets , 1996 .

[45]  A. Leyshon,et al.  Geographies of Industrial Convergence: The Case of Retail Banking , 2000 .

[46]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  The Sociology of Economic Life , 1991 .

[47]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[48]  P. Duguid,et al.  Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[49]  R. Florida.  Toward the Learning Region , 1995 .

[50]  G. Clark,et al.  Accounting Standards and German Supplementary Pensions: The Emerging Framework Underpinning Global Finance , 2000 .

[51]  G. Clark,et al.  The German Social Market in the World of Global Finance: Pension Investment Management and the Limits of Consensual Decision Making , 2000 .

[52]  Paul N. Doremus.  The Myth of the Global Corporation , 1998 .

[53]  Howard Coonley,et al.  Making democracy work , 1941, Electrical Engineering.

[54]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Beyond Mass Production. , 1994 .

[55]  S. Christopherson,et al.  Market Rules and Territorial Outcomes: The Case of the United States* , 1993 .

[56]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Information, Knowledge Vision and Theories of the Firm , 1994 .

[57]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[58]  Alexandre B. Lopes,et al.  The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[59]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Regional motors of the global economy , 1996 .

[60]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[61]  W. H. C.,et al.  Business Economics , 1926, Nature.

[62]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in Mature Industrial Regions: Towards a Social Model of Technology Production , 1993 .

[63]  Simon Reich,et al.  National structures and multinational corporate behavior: enduring differences in the age of globalization , 1997, International Organization.

[64]  R. Kanter.  Thriving locally in the global economy. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[65]  K. Ohmae,et al.  The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies , 1995 .