A network modeling approach to policy implementation in natural resource management agencies

Abstract Natural resource agencies are responsible for managing specific aspects of the environment through the development and implementation of policies. Computational advances have emerged in recent years that provide opportunities for simulating the influence that agency structure has on policy outcomes, particularly those stemming from the area of network theory and analysis. However, there remains a need for methods that can measure and visualize the confounding effects that multiple agency characteristics may impose on policy implementation. The complex interactions among these factors require an approach that can evaluate these factors in relation to one another and provide a way to abstract meaningful findings that can be useful for both scientists and agencies to consider for future policy development. In this study, we present a network simulation modeling approach that (1) builds upon existing conceptualizations of bureaucrat decision-making within agency networks, (2) uses network theory to construct idealized natural resource agency networks that can be used to evaluate how agency structure influences policy implementation, and (3) visualizes simulation results to better understand how bureaucrat behaviors and relationships in concert with agency structure influence policy outcomes. Using this approach, we demonstrate how different aspects of decision-making by bureaucrats interact with the spatial constraints of institutional networks to influence policy outcomes. The network modeling and visualization methods presented here offer an alternative approach in the policy science toolbox that can help generate new assumptions and questions about the ways in which natural resources are governed.

[1]  Birgit H. M. Elands,et al.  Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses , 2001 .

[2]  Johannes Glückler Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks , 2007 .

[3]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks , 1982 .

[4]  S. Charnley,et al.  Understanding micro-processes of institutionalization: stewardship contracting and national forest management , 2014 .

[5]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Network Theory in the Assessment of the Sustainability of Social–Ecological Systems , 2012 .

[6]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[7]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Applying Landscape Science to Natural Resource Management Agents, Individuals, and Networks: Modeling Methods to Inform Natural Resource Management in Regional Landscapes , 2012 .

[8]  B. Arts,et al.  Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends , 2012 .

[9]  R. Riolo,et al.  Interactions between organizations and networks in common-pool resource governance , 2013 .

[10]  William D. Berry,et al.  The Determinants of Success in Implementing an Expert System in State Government , 1998 .

[11]  Manuel Castells,et al.  A Network Theory of Power , 2011 .

[12]  M. Sekher Organized participatory resource management: insights from community forestry practices in India , 2001 .

[13]  Michael T. Gastner,et al.  The spatial structure of networks , 2006 .

[14]  Manuel Castells,et al.  Network Theory| A Network Theory of Power , 2011 .

[15]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Collaborating to Manage: A Primer for the Public Sector , 2012 .

[16]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[17]  L. Carlsson,et al.  The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance , 2008 .

[18]  Garry Robins,et al.  Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games , 2014 .

[19]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Network Modeling and Simulation: A Practical Perspective , 2010 .

[20]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Pollination Services Comparing Coffee Landscapes in Ecuador and Indonesia , 2006 .

[21]  L. Cerveny,et al.  The role of discretion in recreation decision-making by resource professionals in the USDA Forest Service. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Norma M. Riccucci Street-Level Bureaucrats and Intrastate Variation in the Implementation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Policies , 2005 .

[23]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[24]  D. Yates,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1982 .

[25]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process , 1967 .

[26]  Erik Johnston,et al.  A Computational Approach to Managing Performance Dynamics in Networked Governance Systems , 2011 .

[27]  W. Mala,et al.  Benefits of forests in Cameroon. Global structure, issues involving access and decision-making hiccoughs , 2005 .

[28]  Richard E. Matland Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation , 1995 .

[29]  M. Stern,et al.  The meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act within the U.S. Forest Service. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  B. Crona,et al.  Response to Newman and Dale. 2005. "Network Structure, Diversity, and Proactive Resilience Building: a Response to Tompkins and Adger" Social Networks in Natural Resource Management: What Is There to Learn from a Structural Perspective? , 2006 .

[31]  P. Scott Assessing Determinants of Bureaucratic Discretion: An Experiment in Street-Level Decision Making , 1997 .

[32]  Nancy J. Manring ADR and Administrative Responsiveness: Challenges for Public Administrators , 1994 .

[33]  T. Evans Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy , 2011 .

[34]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[35]  Henrik Enroth Policy Network Theory , 2011 .

[36]  B. Crona,et al.  WHAT you know is WHO you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management , 2006 .

[37]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[38]  William H. Simon Legality, Bureaucracy, and Class in the Welfare System , 1983, Welfare Law.

[39]  Ruth Beilin,et al.  Transition Landscapes and Social Networks: Examining On-Gound Community Resilience and its Implications for Policy Settings in Multiscalar Systems , 2013 .