Colour coding for blood collection tube closures – a call for harmonisation

Abstract At least one in 10 patients experience adverse events while receiving hospital care. Many of the errors are related to laboratory diagnostics. Efforts to reduce laboratory errors over recent decades have primarily focused on the measurement process while pre- and post-analytical errors including errors in sampling, reporting and decision-making have received much less attention. Proper sampling and additives to the samples are essential. Tubes and additives are identified not only in writing on the tubes but also by the colour of the tube closures. Unfortunately these colours have not been standardised, running the risk of error when tubes from one manufacturer are replaced by the tubes from another manufacturer that use different colour coding. EFLM therefore supports the worldwide harmonisation of the colour coding for blood collection tube closures and labels in order to reduce the risk of pre-analytical errors and improve the patient safety.

[1]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus , 2014, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[2]  G Lippi,et al.  Standardization of collection requirements for fasting samples: for the Working Group on Preanalytical Phase (WG-PA) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). , 2014, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[3]  Mauro Panteghini,et al.  Harmonization of automated hemolysis index assessment and use: Is it possible? , 2014, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[4]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Promoting clinical and laboratory interaction by harmonization. , 2014, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[5]  W. Greg Miller,et al.  Harmonization: the Sample, the Measurement, and the Report , 2014, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[6]  M. Plebani,et al.  Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicators , 2014, Biochemia medica.

[7]  W. Guder History of the preanalytical phase: a personal view , 2014, Biochemia medica.

[8]  G. Lippi,et al.  Reduction of gross hemolysis in catheter-drawn blood using Greiner Holdex® tube holder , 2013, Biochemia medica.

[9]  J. James A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care , 2013, Journal of patient safety.

[10]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Survey of national guidelines, education and training on phlebotomy in 28 European countries: an original report by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PA) , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[11]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Preanalytical phase – a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[12]  M. Hallworth,et al.  The ‘70% claim’: what is the evidence base? , 2011, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[13]  Mary F. Wisniewski,et al.  Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  N. Franklin,et al.  Diagnostic error in internal medicine. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[16]  M Plebani,et al.  Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  R. Forsman,et al.  Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? , 1996, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  U. Pennsylvania,et al.  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.