Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.

Computed tomography (CT) technology has changed considerably in recent years with the introduction of increasing numbers of multiple detector arrays. There are several parameters specific to multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners that increase or decrease patient dose systematically compared to older single detector computed tomography (SDCT) scanners. This document briefly reviews the MDCT technology, radiation dose in MDCT, including differences from SDCT and factors that affect dose, radiation risks, and the responsibilities for patient dose management. The document recommends that users need to understand the relationship between patient dose and image quality and be aware that image quality in CT is often higher than that necessary for diagnostic confidence. Automatic exposure control (AEC) does not totally free the operator from selection of scan parameters, and awareness of individual systems is important. Scanning protocols cannot simply be transferred between scanners from different manufacturers and should be determined for each MDCT. If the image quality is appropriately specified by the user, and suited to the clinical task, there will be a reduction in patient dose for most patients. Understanding of some parameters is not intuitive and the selection of image quality parameter values in AEC systems is not straightforward. Examples of some clinical situation shave been included to demonstrate dose management, e.g. CT examinations of the chest, the heart for coronary calcium quantification and non-invasive coronary angiography, colonography, the urinary tract, children, pregnant patients, trauma cases, and CT guided interventions. CT is increasingly being used to replace conventional x-ray studies and it is important that patient dose is given careful consideration, particularly with repeated or multiple examinations.

[1]  R. Gagne,et al.  A METHOD FOR DESCRIBING THE DOSES DELIVERED BY TRANSMISSION X‐RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 1981, Medical physics.

[2]  E. Santamarta,et al.  Computed tomography in children with cystic fibrosis: a new way to reduce radiation dose , 2006, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[3]  H Hu,et al.  Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. , 1999, Medical physics.

[4]  P. Dawson Patient dose in multislice CT: why is it increasing and does it matter? , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  J. Lutze,et al.  Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation , 2004, European Radiology.

[6]  L. McCaig,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 Emergency Department Summary , 2002 .

[7]  M. Kalra,et al.  Reducing radiation dose in emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control techniques , 2005, Emergency Radiology.

[8]  M. Zankl,et al.  The adult male voxel model ”Golem” segmented from whole-body CT patient data , 2001, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[9]  Bernhard Schmidt,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  M. Galanski,et al.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey , 2003, European Radiology.

[11]  A. Kangasmäki,et al.  Radiation exposure in body computed tomography examinations of trauma patients , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  D. Frush Computed tomography: important considerations for pediatric patients , 2005, Expert review of medical devices.

[13]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[14]  D. Häussinger,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. , 1999, Medical physics.

[16]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Johnathan L Hadley,et al.  Potential impact of the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria on CT for trauma. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  K S Lee,et al.  Low-Dose, Volumetric Helical CT: Image Quality, Radiation Dose, and Usefulness for Evaluation of Bronchiectasis , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[19]  T. Shipp,et al.  The use of helical computed tomography in pregnancy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 16-slice CT scanner. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study. , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  M. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols , 2001, European Radiology.

[24]  J. Paul,et al.  MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  D McLean,et al.  Paediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia. , 2006, Australasian radiology.

[26]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expositionspraxis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland , 2001 .

[27]  Cynthia H McCollough Automatic exposure control in CT: are we done yet? , 2005, Radiology.

[28]  M. Rehani,et al.  Radiation effects in fluoroscopically guided cardiac interventions--keeping them under control. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[29]  Michael Motro,et al.  Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT and low radiation dose: comparison between 55 and 165 mAs. , 2005, Radiology.

[30]  Manuel Gadella,et al.  References for chapter II , 1989 .

[31]  Stuart G Silverman,et al.  Multidetector CT urography: techniques, clinical applications, and pitfalls. , 2004, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[32]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  W. Pavlicek,et al.  Evaluation of the MDH Industries, Inc. pencil chamber for direct beam CT measurements. , 1979, Health physics.

[34]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Diagnostic CT scans: institutional informed consent guidelines and practices at academic medical centers. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  D. Origgi,et al.  Survey of computed tomography techniques and absorbed dose in Italian hospitals: a comparison between two methods to estimate the dose–length product and the effective dose and to verify fulfilment of the diagnostic reference levels , 2005, European Radiology.

[36]  C. Palmer,et al.  Evaluation of early abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal pain of unknown cause: prospective randomised study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  B. Wintersperger,et al.  Basics of cardiac MDCT: techniques and contrast application , 2005, European radiology.

[38]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. , 2005, Radiology.

[39]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  Robert A. Jucius,et al.  Radiation Dosimetry In Computed Tomography (CT) , 1977, Other Conferences.

[41]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[42]  S. Nosaka,et al.  [Current practice of pediatric MDCT in Japan: survey results of demographics and age-based dose reduction]. , 2005, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica.

[43]  Ulrich Baum,et al.  Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose) , 2002, European Radiology.

[44]  W. Kalender,et al.  A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images , 2004, European Radiology.

[45]  Hiroshi Niimi,et al.  Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA , 2004, European Radiology.

[46]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  C. Catalano,et al.  Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. , 2003, Radiology.

[48]  Shinichiro Mori,et al.  Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for four-dimensional imaging. , 2004, Medical physics.

[49]  James A Brink,et al.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. , 2004, Radiology.

[50]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[51]  K F King,et al.  Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation. , 1990, Medical physics.

[52]  O. Linton,et al.  American College of Radiology , 2018, Definitions.

[53]  K. Thomas,et al.  Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians , 2006, Pediatric Radiology.

[54]  B. Zheng,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[55]  A. Beck,et al.  Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  E F Halpern,et al.  [Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening]. , 2006, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[57]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[58]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[59]  Nico Buls,et al.  Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. , 2003 .

[60]  D. G. Jones,et al.  Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques , 1991 .

[61]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  General principles of MDCT. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[62]  J. Heggie Patient doses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation , 2009, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[63]  J. Paul,et al.  Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[64]  Ulf Nyman,et al.  Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients , 2006, European Radiology.

[65]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The phantom portion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) computed tomography (CT) accreditation program: practical tips, artifact examples, and pitfalls to avoid. , 2004, Medical physics.

[66]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Radiation from "extra" images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation. , 2004, Radiology.

[67]  R. Günther,et al.  [Multislice spiral CT (MSCT) in pediatric radiology: dose reduction for chest and abdomen examinations]. , 2004, RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (Print).

[68]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[69]  P. Carrascosa,et al.  Low radiation dose multislice CT colonography in children: Experience after 100 studies. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[70]  R. Bale,et al.  [Radiation exposure in single slice and multi-slice spiral CT (a phantom study)]. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[71]  Silvia D. Chang,et al.  Radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography: the role of patient size and the selection of tube current. , 2006, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[72]  C. Heyer,et al.  Evaluation of chronic infectious interstitial pulmonary disease in children by low-dose CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy , 2005, European Radiology.

[73]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Multi-detector CT of the Chest: Influence of Dose Onto Quantitative Evaluation of Severe Emphysema A Simulation Study , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[74]  M. Rehani,et al.  Radiation doses in computed tomography , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[75]  Philip H Heintz,et al.  CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. , 2002, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[76]  D. D. Nagel Significance of overbeaming and overranging effects of single-and multi-slice CT scanners , 2005 .

[77]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[78]  Sharyn I. Katz,et al.  Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[79]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[80]  C. Yi,et al.  Multidetector CT of bronchiectasis: effect of radiation dose on image quality. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[81]  L. F. Rogers Taking care of children: check out the parameters used for helical CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[82]  W. Leitz,et al.  Computed Tomography Dose Assessment - A Practical Approach , 1995 .

[83]  L. Pike,et al.  Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[84]  C. H. McCollough Optimization of multidetector array CT acquisition parameters for CT colonography , 2001, Abdominal Imaging.

[85]  C. Catalano,et al.  Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. , 2005, Radiology.

[86]  T M Yelbuz,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[87]  J. Aldrich,et al.  Change in patient doses from radiological examinations at the Vancouver General Hospital, 1991-2002. , 2005, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[88]  Karl Stierstorfer,et al.  Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. , 2005, Radiology.

[89]  C. McCollough Patient Dose in Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2003, Herz.

[90]  D. H. Forsted,et al.  CT of pregnant women for urinary tract calculi, pulmonary thromboembolism, and acute appendicitis. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[91]  S. Edyvean,et al.  Patient dose reduction in CT. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[92]  M Mahesh,et al.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[93]  J. Heggie,et al.  Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols. , 2006, Australasian radiology.

[94]  A Workman,et al.  Application of draft European Commission reference levels to a regional CT dose survey. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[95]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. , 2005, Radiology.

[96]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[97]  G. Needham Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology--guidelines for doctors. , 1996, Health bulletin.

[98]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[99]  G. Brix,et al.  [5 years of "concerted action dose reduction in CT" -- what has been achieved and what remains to be done?]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[100]  W. Kalender,et al.  Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. , 1990, Radiology.

[101]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[102]  Walter Huda,et al.  When a pregnant woman with suspected appendicitis is referred for a CT scan, what should a radiologist do to minimize potential radiation risks? , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[103]  S. Schaller,et al.  Spiral interpolation algorithm for multislice spiral CT. I. Theory , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[104]  J. Remy,et al.  Asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases: evaluation with low-dose four-detector row spiral CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[105]  Jo-Anne Shepard,et al.  Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[106]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[107]  Junpei Ikezoe,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation of Normal and Abnormal Lungs With Ultra-High-Resolution CT , 2004, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[108]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.

[109]  E. Scaife,et al.  CT scan and the pediatric trauma patient--are we overdoing it? , 2004, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[110]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Does Ultra-Low-Dose CT With a Radiation Dose Equivalent to That of KUB Suffice to Detect Renal and Ureteral Calculi? , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[111]  G. Stamm,et al.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[112]  S. Schaller,et al.  Individually weight-adapted examination protocol in retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the heart , 2003, European Radiology.

[113]  V. Tsapaki,et al.  Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[114]  John M Boone,et al.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. , 2003, Radiology.

[115]  A. Dixon,et al.  Abdominal CT and the Euratom Directive , 2002, European Radiology.

[116]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. , 2005, Radiology.

[117]  P. Vock CT dose reduction in children , 2005, European Radiology.

[118]  J. Soto,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma: utility of 5-minute delayed CT with a reduced radiation dose. , 2006, Radiology.

[119]  W. Heindel,et al.  Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT , 2004, European Radiology.

[120]  S. Charman,et al.  Information given to patients about adverse effects of radiotherapy: a survey of patients' views. , 2004, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[121]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[122]  W Huda,et al.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[123]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[124]  J Simon,et al.  Image reconstruction and performance evaluation for ECG-gated spiral scanning with a 16-slice CT system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[125]  W. Kalender,et al.  Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. , 2001, Medical physics.

[126]  E. Paulson,et al.  Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[127]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Multidetector Computed Tomography Technology: Current Status and Emerging Developments , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[128]  Whole-body CT health screening. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[129]  J. Haaga,et al.  Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[130]  R A Kruger,et al.  Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners. , 1996, Medical physics.

[131]  T. Ptak,et al.  Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[132]  G Adam,et al.  [Image quality of thin- and thick-slice MSCT reconstructions in low-contrast objects (liver lesions) with equal doses]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[133]  D. Origgi,et al.  A survey of 14 computed tomography scanners in Greece and 32 scanners in Italy. Examination frequencies, dose reference values, effective doses and doses to organs. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[134]  C H McCollough,et al.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[135]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Screening of lung cancer with low dose spiral CT: results of a three year pilot study and design of the randomised controlled trial ''Italung-CT''. , 2005, La Radiologia medica.

[136]  Virginia Tsapaki,et al.  Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT--IAEA-coordinated research project. , 2006, Radiology.