The development of capability: the content of potential and the potential of content
暂无分享,去创建一个
All too often discussion of Capability proceeds as if it is clear what ‘Capability’ is: and that all that is required is the ascertaining of means for developing it. This paper seeks to explore the meanings of Capability. It provides two broad meanings, and discusses the paradoxes inherent in the application of these to the real world of management and business. On the one hand, Capability is defined as Potential, what the individual could achieve. Potential is an endowment, which is realised by the acquisition of skills and knowledge, i.e. the acquisition of Content. On the other hand, Capability is defined as Content: what the individual can (or has learned to) do. This Content has been acquired by, or input into, the individual, who then has the Potential to develop further. So there are different routes to Capability, depending on the definition of Capability one chooses. All of this impinges on the development of Capability. This leads us on to a consideration of whether the ‘Development of Capability’ is a meaningful concept.
[1] John Stephenson,et al. Quality in Learning: A Capability Approach in Higher Education , 1992 .
[2] I. Grugulis. The management NVQ: a critique of the myth of relevance , 2000 .
[3] R. Brown. Meta‐Competence: A Recipe for Reframing the Competence Debate , 1993 .
[4] R. Brown,et al. Learning About Knowing, Knowing About Learning: Management Education on a Part‐time MBA , 1994 .