Judgments of learning are significantly higher following feedback on relatively good versus relatively poor trials despite no actual learning differences.

Studies have consistently shown that prospective metacognitive judgments of learning are often inaccurate because humans mistakenly interpret current performance levels as valid indices of learning. These metacognitive discrepancies are strongly related to conditions of practice. Here, we examined how the type of feedback (after good versus poor trials) received during practice and awareness (aware versus unaware) of this manipulation affected judgments of learning and actual learning. After each six-trial block, participants received feedback on their three best trials or three worst trials and half of the participants were made explicitly aware of the type of feedback they received while the other half were unaware. Judgments of learning were made at the end of each six-trial block and before the 24-h retention test. Results indicated no motor performance differences between groups in practice or retention; however, receiving feedback on relatively good compared to relatively poor trials resulted in significantly higher judgments of learning in practice and retention, irrespective of awareness. These results suggest that KR on relatively good versus relatively poor trials can have dissociable effects on judgments of learning in the absence of actual learning differences, even when participants are made aware of their feedback manipulation.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  C. Shea,et al.  Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Farzad Maleki,et al.  Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning , 2012 .

[4]  Michael J. Carter,et al.  Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. , 2010, Human movement science.

[5]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[6]  Michael J. Carter,et al.  Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005) , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Joao A. C. Barros,et al.  Self-Controlled Amount of Practice Benefits Learning of a Motor Skill , 2011, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  Jae T Patterson,et al.  Knowing the good from the bad: does being aware of KR content matter? , 2012, Human movement science.

[9]  Anthony J Bishara,et al.  Memory and metacognition for piano melodies: Illusory advantages of fixed- over random-order practice , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Joao A. C. Barros,et al.  Self-Controlled Practice Within a Fixed Time Period Facilitates the Learning of a Basketball Set Shot , 2014 .

[11]  R. Bjork,et al.  Metacognition in motor learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  G. R. Hancock,et al.  On the Problem of Two-Dimensional Error Scores: Measures and Analyses of Accuracy, Bias, and Consistency. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Luis Augusto Teixeira,et al.  Timing and Force Components in Bilateral Transfer of Learning , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Jeffrey T. Fairbrother,et al.  Self-control behaviors during the learning of a cascade juggling task. , 2015, Human movement science.

[16]  G. Wulf,et al.  Feedback After Good Versus Poor Trials Affects Intrinsic Motivation , 2011, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[17]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-Controlled Feedback: Does it Enhance Learning Because Performers Get Feedback When They Need It? , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[18]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Understanding Self-Controlled Motor Learning Protocols through the Self-Determination Theory , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[19]  M. Fischman.  On the continuing problem of inappropriate learning measures: Comment on Wulf et al. (2014) and Wulf et al. (2015). , 2015, Human movement science.

[20]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[21]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Distributed Learning: Data, Metacognition, and Educational Implications , 2012, Educational Psychology Review.

[23]  G. Wulf,et al.  External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. , 2015, Human movement science.

[24]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Feedback About More Accurate Versus Less Accurate Trials , 2012, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  C. Shea,et al.  Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors , 2010, Medical education.

[26]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Versus Performance , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[27]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Feedback After Good Trials Enhances Learning , 2007, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[28]  C. Wrisberg,et al.  Immediate and Delayed Bilateral Transfer of Throwing Accuracy in Male and Female Children , 2005, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[29]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Models of performance in learning multisegment movement tasks: consequences for acquisition, retention, and judgments of learning. , 2002 .

[30]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[32]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  Using One-Dimensional Task Error Measures to Assess Performance on Two-Dimensional Tasks: Comment on 'Attentional Control, Distractors, and Motor Performance' , 1994 .

[33]  G. Wulf,et al.  Knowledge of Results After Good Trials Enhances Learning in Older Adults , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.