Physically-Based Validation of Deformable Medical Image Registration

We propose a new approach for validating deformable image registration algorithms. Since difference images do not necessarily reflect the 3D correspondence of organs, we propose to use the deformation fields generated in our FEM-based simulations to assess the displacement resulted from other registration methods. Unlike traditional FEM-based registration methods, the boundary condition for the target organ is not given explicitly. Instead it is driven by inter-organ contact forces generated by boundary conditions on surrounding organs to reduce the uncertainty induced by geometry-based surface matching. To validate our system, real CT images of the male pelvis are analyzed, and the prostate can be reasonably registered without matching its surface to the image. Several registration methods are then evaluated using our system.

[1]  Sarang Joshi,et al.  Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Registration of 3D Intraoperative MR Images of the Brain Using a Finite Element Biomechanical Model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  Registration of images with geometric distortions , 1988 .

[4]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2000 , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2003 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  A. Khotanzad,et al.  A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  3D Image Matching Using a Finite Element Based Elastic Deformation Model , 1999, MICCAI.

[11]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  A Finite Element Model for Functional Analysis of 4D Cardiac-Tagged MR Images , 2003, MICCAI.

[13]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Development of multiorgan finite element-based prostate deformation model enabling registration of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[16]  D. Yan,et al.  Reducing uncertainties in volumetric image based deformable organ registration. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  E. Messing,et al.  Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Computer-Assisted Intervention,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99 , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Y. Chen,et al.  Image registration via level-set motion: Applications to atlas-based segmentation , 2003, Medical Image Anal..