Delayed Response and Biosonar Perception Explain Movement Coordination in Trawling Bats

Animal coordinated movement interactions are commonly explained by assuming unspecified social forces of attraction, repulsion and alignment with parameters drawn from observed movement data. Here we propose and test a biologically realistic and quantifiable biosonar movement interaction mechanism for echolocating bats based on spatial perceptual bias, i.e. actual sound field, a reaction delay, and observed motor constraints in speed and acceleration. We found that foraging pairs of bats flying over a water surface swapped leader-follower roles and performed chases or coordinated manoeuvres by copying the heading a nearby individual has had up to 500 ms earlier. Our proposed mechanism based on the interplay between sensory-motor constraints and delayed alignment was able to recreate the observed spatial actor-reactor patterns. Remarkably, when we varied model parameters (response delay, hearing threshold and echolocation directionality) beyond those observed in nature, the spatio-temporal interaction patterns created by the model only recreated the observed interactions, i.e. chases, and best matched the observed spatial patterns for just those response delays, hearing thresholds and echolocation directionalities found to be used by bats. This supports the validity of our sensory ecology approach of movement coordination, where interacting bats localise each other by active echolocation rather than eavesdropping.

[1]  Dong Zhou,et al.  Translation techniques in cross-language information retrieval , 2012, CSUR.

[2]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[3]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Arthur Pewsey,et al.  A Family of Symmetric Distributions on the Circle , 2005 .

[5]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[6]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  The echolocation and hunting behavior of Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentoni , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models in biology , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Semantic trajectories modeling and analysis , 2013, CSUR.

[10]  M. Holderied,et al.  An Aerial-Hawking Bat Uses Stealth Echolocation to Counter Moth Hearing , 2010, Current Biology.

[11]  E. Kalko,et al.  Echolocation calls in Central American emballonurid bats: signal design and call frequency alternation , 2007 .

[12]  Kamran Safi,et al.  Experimental evidence for group hunting via eavesdropping in echolocating bats , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  B. Siemers,et al.  Growth of horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in temperate continental conditions and the influence of climate , 2007 .

[14]  Ran Nathan,et al.  An emerging movement ecology paradigm , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Thomas J. McKetterick,et al.  Exact dynamics of stochastic linear delayed systems: application to spatiotemporal coordination of comoving agents. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Surlykke Annemarie.  Convergent Acoustic Field of View in Echolocating Bats , 2012 .

[17]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European 'trawling' bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  M. Holderied,et al.  Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  S. Levin,et al.  Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives , 2013 .

[20]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[22]  M. Holderied,et al.  The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  B. Siemers,et al.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk , 1983, Oecologia.

[28]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Kevin Warburton.  Animal Groups in Three Dimensions: Social forces in animal congregations: Interactive, motivational, and sensory aspects , 1997 .

[30]  Takeshi Shirabe,et al.  Correlation Analysis of Discrete Motions , 2006, GIScience.

[31]  Luca Giuggioli,et al.  A milestone for movement ecology research , 2013, Movement ecology.

[32]  Puduru Viswanadha Reddy,et al.  Effects of competitive prey capture on flight behavior and sonar beam pattern in paired big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[35]  C. Moss,et al.  Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences , 2012, Interface Focus.

[37]  Bertel Møhl.  Target Detection by Echolocating Bats , 1988 .

[38]  Trisalyn A. Nelson,et al.  Measuring Dynamic Interaction in Movement Data , 2013, Trans. GIS.

[39]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[40]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[41]  Spatio-Temporal Structure of Hooded Gull Flocks , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  S. Rice.  Mathematical analysis of random noise , 1944 .

[43]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Flocking of multi-agents with time delay , 2012, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[44]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups , 2013, Current Biology.

[45]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  From behavioural analyses to models of collective motion in fish schools , 2012, Interface Focus.

[46]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The sensory basis of fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and vision , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[48]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[50]  J. Steffensen,et al.  Aerobic capacity influences the spatial position of individuals within fish schools , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.