Simulated Multispectral Imagery for Tree Species Classification Using Support Vector Machines

The information content of remotely sensed data depends primarily on the spatial and spectral properties of the imaging device. This paper focuses on the classification performance of the different spectral features (hyper- and multispectral measurements) with respect to three tree species. The Support Vector Machine was chosen as the classification algorithm for these features. A simulated optical radiation model was constructed to evaluate the identification performance of the given multispectral system for the tree species, and the effects of spectral-band selection and data preprocessing were studied in this setting. Simulations were based on the reflectance measurements of the pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), spruce [ Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.], and birch trees (Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Betula pendula Roth). Leica ADS80 airborne sensor with four spectral bands (channels) was used as a fixed multispectral sensor system that leads to response values for the at-sensor radiance signal. Results suggest that this four-band system has inadequate classification performance for the three tree species. The simulations demonstrate on average a 5-15 percentage points improvement in classification performance when the Leica system is combined with one additional spectral band. It is also demonstrated for the Leica data that feature mapping through a Mahalanobis kernel leads to a 5-10 percentage points improvement in classification performance when compared with other kernels.

[1]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Subspace methods of pattern recognition , 1983 .

[2]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  George M. Phillips,et al.  Theory and applications of numerical analysis , 1976, The Mathematical Gazette.

[4]  Chein-I. Chang.  Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification , 2003 .

[5]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with kernels , 1998 .

[6]  A. Haara,et al.  Tree Species Classification using Semi-automatic Delineation of Trees on Aerial Images , 2002 .

[7]  G. Foody.  Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy , 2004 .

[8]  Michael D. Steven,et al.  High resolution derivative spectra in remote sensing , 1990 .

[9]  I. Korpela.  Individual tree measurements by means of digital aerial photogrammetry , 2004, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[10]  Thomas G. Dietterich.  Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms , 1998, Neural Computation.

[11]  G. Mercier,et al.  Support vector machines for hyperspectral image classification with spectral-based kernels , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[12]  L. S. Davis,et al.  An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classi(cid:142) cation , 2002 .

[13]  D. Leckie,et al.  INDIVIDUAL TREE CROWN SPECIES RECOGNITION: THE NAHMINT STUDY , 1999 .

[14]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  U. Beisl.  Absolute spectroradiometric calibration of the ADS40 sensor , 2006 .

[17]  William Philpot,et al.  A derivative-aided hyperspectral image analysis system for land-cover classification , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  J. Parkkinen,et al.  Classification of the reflectance spectra of pine, spruce, and birch. , 1994, Applied optics.

[19]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Detection of Aspens Using High Resolution Aerial Laser Scanning Data and Digital Aerial Images , 2008, Sensors.

[20]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Field calibration of reference reflectance panels , 1987 .

[21]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[22]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Shigeo Abe.  Training of Support Vector Machines with Mahalanobis Kernels , 2005, ICANN.