Participation and Data Quality in Open Data use: Open Data Infrastructures Evaluated

Infrastructures may improve the use of Open Government Data (OGD) by providing insight in how individuals can participate in data reuse and in the quality of open data. Yet, most OGD infrastructures do not support such activities. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the importance and usability of participation mechanisms and data quality indicators for open data infrastructures through quasi-experiments. A quasiexperiment is an experimental evaluation method in which researchers have control over the (non-random) assignment of participants to treatment and control conditions, the selection of control conditions and the organisation of the treatment, and over the measures. Moreover, quasi-experiments usually include a pre-test (i.e. a test before the treatment or control condition) and a post-test (i.e. a test after the treatment or control condition). The results of our quasi-experiments showed that the prototype of our OGD infrastructure improved OGD participation and data quality analysis by providing functionalities including discussion messages, social media sharing, linking items related to a dataset, Wiki descriptions and discussions, and data quality ratings and reviews. Participant observations showed that participants in the treatment group found it easier to conduct tasks with the prototype related to giving feedback on and discussing open data and rating and reviewing data quality than the participants in the control group. Our study suggested that participation mechanisms and quality indicators add value and improve the use of OGD. It recommends the implementation of such mechanisms and indicators in existing OGD infrastructures. To support the creation of transparency, citizen participation and innovation with OGD, our findings suggest that participation mechanisms and data quality indicators are a condition. Yet, these mechanisms and indicators are not sufficient for ensuring the generation of the OGD benefits, since there are still many factors which hinder the generation of these benefits. We discuss a number of these factors including factors related to OGD infrastructures and factors beyond OGD infrastructures.

[1]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects , 2001, UAI.

[2]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Reasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for Intelligent Data Access , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. , 1975 .

[4]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[5]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Open data movement in Greece: a case study on open government data sources , 2013, PCI '13.

[6]  Natalie Helbig,et al.  Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency , 2010, EGOV.

[7]  Chris J. Martin Barriers to the Open Government Data Agenda: Taking a Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[8]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  An International Survey of the Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Open Government , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  George Kuk,et al.  The Roles of Agency and Artifacts in Assembling Open Data Complementarities , 2011, ICIS.

[11]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  J. Kucera,et al.  Benefits and Risks of Open Government Data , 2014 .

[13]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Spiros Mouzakitis,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Analysis of the Current Public Data Landscape from a Functional, Semantic and Technical Perspective , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[15]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data , 2014 .

[16]  Tim Davies,et al.  Open data, democracy and public sector reform. A look at open government data use from data.gov.uk , 2010 .

[17]  Bastiaan van Loenen,et al.  Brave New Open Data World? , 2012, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[18]  Li Zhao,et al.  Information quality and community municipal portal use , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[20]  João Porto de Albuquerque,et al.  An Account of Research on Open Government Data (2007-2012): A Systematic Literature Review , 2013, EGOV/ePart Ongoing Research.

[21]  Mohsen Kahani,et al.  A Metrics-Driven Approach for Quality Assessment of Linked Open Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[22]  Katrin Braunschweig,et al.  The State of Open Data Limits of Current Open Data Platforms , 2012 .

[23]  Wendy Hall,et al.  Building a Pragmatic Semantic Web , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[24]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  A Framework for Benchmarking Open Government Data Efforts , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  Business models for Linked Open Government Data: what lies beneath? , 2013 .

[26]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  Introduction to Linked Data and Its Lifecycle on the Web , 2013, Reasoning Web.

[27]  Leonid Stoimenov,et al.  Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement , 2009, CSUR.

[29]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  On the barriers for local government releasing open data , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  K. O’Hara Data quality, government data and the open data infosphere , 2012 .

[32]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Evaluating Second Generation Open Government Data Infrastructures Using Value Models , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.