Dimensional analysis of 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty using X-ray microcomputed tomography

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is increasingly used to produce orthopaedic components for hip arthroplasty, such as acetabular cups, which show complex lattice porous structures and shapes. However, limitations on the quality of the final implants are present; thus, investigations are needed to ensure adequate quality and patients safety. X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has been recognised to be the most suitable method to evaluate the complexity of 3D-printed parts. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of a micro-CT analysis method comparing it with reference systems, such as coordinate measuring machine and electron microscopy.,3D-printed acetabular components for hip arthroplasty (n = 2) were investigated. Dimensions related to the dense and porous regions of the samples were measured. The micro-CT scanning parameters (voltage – kV, current – µA) were optimised selecting six combinations of beam voltage and current.,Micro-CT showed good correlation and agreement with both coordinate measuring machine and scanning electron microscopy when optimal scanning parameters were selected (130 kV – 100 µA to 180 kV – 80 µA). Mean discrepancies of 50 µm (± 300) and 20 µm (± 60) were found between the techniques for dense and porous dimensions. Investigation method such as micro-CT imaging may help to better understand the impact of 3D printing manufacturing technology on the properties of orthopaedic implants.,The optimisation of the scanning parameters and the validation of this method with reference techniques may guide further analysis of similar orthopaedic components.

[1]  J. Henckel,et al.  3D Printed Acetabular Cups for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review Article , 2019, Metals.

[2]  Paul J. Scott,et al.  Surface texture evaluation of additively manufactured metallic cellular scaffolds for acetabular implants using X-ray computed tomography , 2019, Bio-Design and Manufacturing.

[3]  P. Scott,et al.  Surface texture evaluation of additively manufactured metallic cellular scaffolds for acetabular implants using X-ray computed tomography , 2019, Bio-Design and Manufacturing.

[4]  Anton du Plessis,et al.  X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography in Additive Manufacturing: A Review of the Current Technology and Applications , 2018, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing.

[5]  Alex Attridge,et al.  Computed tomography metrological examination of additive manufactured acetabular hip prosthesis cups , 2018, Additive Manufacturing.

[6]  G. Blunn,et al.  Additive manufacturing: current concepts, future trends. , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[7]  L. Murr Additive manufacturing of biomedical devices: an overview , 2018 .

[8]  S. Killi Additive Manufacturing: Design, Methods, and Processes , 2017 .

[9]  Anders Palmquist,et al.  A technique for evaluating bone ingrowth into 3D printed, porous Ti6Al4V implants accurately using X-ray micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry. , 2017, Micron.

[10]  Paul J. Bills,et al.  Comparison of different additive manufacturing methods using computed tomography , 2016 .

[11]  du PlessisAnton,et al.  Quality Control of a Laser Additive Manufactured Medical Implant by X-Ray Tomography , 2016 .

[12]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review , 2016 .

[13]  Tomiharu Matsushita,et al.  Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[14]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  Carolin Körner,et al.  Compression-compression fatigue of selective electron beam melted cellular titanium (Ti-6Al-4V). , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[16]  J. Kruth,et al.  Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures , 2011 .

[17]  E. Baril,et al.  Direct visualization and quantification of bone growth into porous titanium implants using micro computed tomography , 2011, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[18]  L. Fedrizzi,et al.  Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: Trabecular titanium. , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[20]  R. Singer,et al.  Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[22]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[23]  Stuart T. Smith,et al.  Dimensional metrology with X-ray CT: A comparison with CMM measurements on internal features and compliant structures , 2018 .

[24]  Li Wei,et al.  医用ハイパースペクトル画像における血液細胞分類を行う平列計算 | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2016 .

[25]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Computed tomography for dimensional metrology , 2011 .

[26]  L. Murr,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.