Diversity for design: a framework for involving neurodiverse children in the technology design process

The neurodiversity movement seeks to positively reframe certain neurological conditions, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and dyslexia, by concentrating on their strengths. In recent years, neurodiverse children have increasingly been involved in the technology design process, but the design approaches adopted have focused mostly on overcoming difficulties of working with these children, leaving their strengths untapped. We present a new participatory design (PD) framework, Diversity for Design (D4D), which provides guidance for technology designers working with neurodiverse children in establishing PD methods that capitalize on children's strengths and also support potential difficulties. We present two case studies of use of the D4D framework, involving children with ASD and dyslexia, showing how it informed the development and refinement of PD methods tailored to these populations. In addition, we show how to apply the D4D framework to other neurodiverse populations.

[1]  D. Montgomery.  Gifted and Talented Children with Special Educational Needs: Double Exceptionality , 2003 .

[2]  E. Schopler,et al.  The Teacch Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2004, Springer US.

[3]  Eamonn O'Neill,et al.  Understanding design as a social creative process , 2005, C&C '05.

[4]  Andrew Large,et al.  “Bonded design”: A novel approach to intergenerational information technology design , 2006 .

[5]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[6]  Allison Druin,et al.  Designing with and for children with special needs: an inclusionary model , 2008, IDC.

[7]  F. Happé,et al.  What aspects of autism predispose to talent? , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Jim Rose,et al.  Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties : an independent report , 2009 .

[9]  S. Baron-Cohen.  Autism: The Empathizing–Systemizing (E‐S) Theory , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Areej Al-Wabil,et al.  Designing Educational Games for Children with Specific Learning Difficulties: Insights from Involving Children and Practitioners , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Multi-conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology.

[11]  Jussi A. Nuutinen,et al.  Designing technologies with children with special needs: Children in the Centre (CiC) framework , 2010, IDC.

[12]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  IDEAS: an interface design experience for the autistic spectrum , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  S. Cobb,et al.  A method for involving children with autism in design , 2011, IDC.

[14]  C. Frauenberger,et al.  Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design , 2011 .

[15]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Adding reinforced corners: designing interactive technologies for children with disabilities , 2012, INTR.

[16]  Micah O. Mazurek,et al.  Prevalence and Correlates of Screen-Based Media Use Among Youths with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2011, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[17]  Gustavo Armagno,et al.  The Role of HCI in the Construction of Disability , 2012 .

[18]  H. Van Rijn.  Meaningful Encounters: Explorative studies about designers learning from children with autism , 2012 .

[19]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  Developing IDEAS: supporting children with autism within a participatory design team , 2012, CHI.

[20]  Lauren E. Sherman,et al.  Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[21]  Gemma Burford,et al.  What Is Participation? Design Leads the Way to a Cross-Disciplinary Framework , 2013, Design Issues.

[22]  Robert Fohlin,et al.  Designing for Special Education Schools: Involving Children with Intellectual Disabilities in the Design Process , 2013 .

[23]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  Cooperative Inquiry Extended: Creating Technology with Middle School Students with Learning Differences , 2013 .

[24]  Nicholas Sheep Dalton,et al.  Neurodiversity HCI , 2013, INTR.

[25]  Allison Druin,et al.  Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design , 2013, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..