A Novel Estimation Method for Physiological Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Application of a Distributed Parameter Model Using Fourier-Domain Calculations

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool in the evaluation of tumor physiology. From rapidly acquired images and a model for contrast agent pharmacokinetics, physiological parameters are derived. One pharmacokinetic model, the tissue homogeneity model, enables estimation of both blood flow and vessel permeability together with parameters that describe blood volume and extracellular extravascular volume fraction. However, studies have shown that parameter estimation with this model is unstable. Therefore, several initial guesses are needed for accurate estimates, which makes the estimation slow. In this study a new estimation algorithm for the tissue homogeneity model, based on Fourier domain calculations, was derived and implemented as a Matlab program. The algorithm was tested with Monte-Carlo simulations and the results were compared to an existing method that uses the adiabatic approximation. The algorithm was also tested on data from a metastasis in the brain. The comparison showed that the new algorithm gave more accurate results on the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile levels, for instance the error in blood volume was reduced by 21%. In addition, the time needed for the computations was reduced with a factor 25. It was concluded that the new algorithm can be used to speed up parameter estimation while accuracy can be gained at the same time.

[1]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology: Theory, Data Acquisition, Analysis, and Examples. , 2007, Current medical imaging reviews.

[3]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  S. Kety The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues. , 1951, Pharmacological reviews.

[5]  E S Carlsson The cardiovascular system. , 1972, Investigative radiology.

[6]  D. Drost,et al.  Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[10]  T S Koh,et al.  The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Tong San Koh,et al.  A distributed parameter model of cerebral blood-tissue exchange with account of capillary transit time distribution , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Okunieff,et al.  Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. , 1989, Cancer research.

[13]  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain : I . Theoretical Derivation , .

[14]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  D. Buckley,et al.  Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  F. Prato,et al.  Modeling tissue contrast agent concentration: A solution to the tissue homogeneity model using a simulated arterial input function , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Tong San Koh,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of intracranial meningioma: comparison of distributed and compartmental tracer kinetic models--initial results. , 2004, Radiology.

[18]  D. Hristov,et al.  Adapting radiotherapy to hypoxic tumours , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  G. Parker,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[22]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[23]  C A McKenzie,et al.  Improved contrast agent bolus tracking using T1 FARM , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Evis Sala,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  K. B. Larson,et al.  Tracer-Kinetic Models for Measuring Cerebral Blood Flow Using Externally Detected Radiotracers , 1987, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[26]  C. Goresky,et al.  On the uptake of materials by the intact liver. The transport and net removal of galactose. , 1973, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[27]  N. Simionescu,et al.  The Cardiovascular System , 1983 .