Effects of conventional and slanted ventral slot procedures on the biomechanical behavior of the C5-C6 vertebral motion unit in dogs.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of conventional and slanted ventral slot procedures on the biomechanical behavior of the C5-C6 vertebral motion unit (VMU) in dogs. SAMPLE 14 vertebral columns (C4 through C7) from canine cadavers. PROCEDURES Specimens were assigned to a conventional or slanted ventral slot group (n = 7/group). For each specimen, the C5-C6 VMU was tested in ventral and dorsal bending and positive and negative axial torsion before and after surgery. Range of motion (ROM), stiffness, and energy absorption were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Both procedures significantly increased the ROM and stiffness and significantly decreased the energy absorption of the C5-C6 VMU in ventral and dorsal bending. Both procedures also increased the ROM in positive and negative axial torsion. In negative torsion, total stiffness and stiffness over the maximum ROM tested decreased less for the slanted slot procedure than for the conventional slot procedure. There were no significant differences between procedures for any of the other biomechanical outcomes examined. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that the biomechanical response of the C5-C6 VMU to the conventional and slanted ventral slot procedures was not significantly different, especially when considering postsurgical instability induced by both procedures. This was most likely due to disruption of the nucleus pulposus and dorsal annulus fibrosus of the disk with both procedures. On the basis of these findings, neither procedure appeared biomechanically superior. Comparative clinical studies are warranted to further evaluate the 2 procedures.

[1]  G. Fosgate,et al.  Biomechanical comparison between bicortical pin and monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate constructs in the cadaveric canine cervical vertebral column. , 2013, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[2]  H. Hazewinkel,et al.  Intervertebral disc degeneration in the dog. Part 1: Anatomy and physiology of the intervertebral disc and characteristics of intervertebral disc degeneration. , 2013, Veterinary journal.

[3]  B. Brisson.  Intervertebral disc disease in dogs. , 2010, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[4]  A. Vasavada,et al.  In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar-polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs. , 2009, American journal of veterinary research.

[5]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5. , 2009, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[6]  N. Suwankong,et al.  Biomechanical flexion-extension forces in normal canine lumbosacral cadaver specimens before and after dorsal laminectomy-discectomy and pedicle screw-rod fixation. , 2007, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[7]  M. Markel,et al.  In vitro biomechanical comparison of cervical disk arthroplasty, ventral slot procedure, and smooth pins with polymethylmethacrylate fixation at treated and adjacent canine cervical motion units. , 2007, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  W. McCartney.  Comparison of recovery times and complication rates between a modified slanted slot and the standard ventral slot for the treatment of cervical disc disease in 20 dogs. , 2007, The Journal of small animal practice.

[9]  Stephen J Ferguson,et al.  Minimizing errors during in vitro testing of multisegmental spine specimens: considerations for component selection and kinematic measurement. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  G. McCabe,et al.  Effect of width of disk fenestration and a ventral slot on biomechanics of the canine C5-C6 vertebral motion unit. , 2006, American journal of veterinary research.

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  What is Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, and What Causes It? , 2006, Spine.

[12]  S. Stover,et al.  Effect of a ventral slot procedure and of smooth or positive-profile threaded pins with polymethylmethacrylate fixation on intervertebral biomechanics at treated and adjacent canine cervical vertebral motion units. , 2005, American journal of veterinary research.

[13]  J. Coates,et al.  A retrospective comparison of cervical intervertebral disk disease in nonchondrodystrophic large dogs versus small dogs. , 2004, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[14]  W. Renberg,et al.  In vitro evaluation of biomechanical effects of multiple hemilaminectomies on the canine lumbar vertebral column. , 2003, American journal of veterinary research.

[15]  I. Kingma,et al.  In Vitro Torsion-Induced Stress Distribution Changes in Porcine Intervertebral Discs , 2001, Spine.

[16]  G. Hosgood,et al.  Vertebral subluxation following ventral cervical decompression in the dog. , 2000, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[17]  D W Hukins,et al.  Effect of removing the nucleus pulposus on the deformation of the annulus fibrosus during compression of the intervertebral disc. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  G. Hosgood,et al.  Caudal cervical intervertebral disk disease in the small dog: role of distraction and stabilization in ventral slot decompression. , 2000, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[19]  S. Stover,et al.  Effect of disk fenestration on sagittal kinematics of the canine C5-C6 intervertebral space. , 1999, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[20]  L. Claes,et al.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[21]  M. Krismer,et al.  The Contribution of Anulus Fibers to Torque Resistance , 1996, Spine.

[22]  Y K Liu,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Lumbar Spinal Motion Segments as Affected by Partial Disc Removal , 1986, Spine.

[23]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[24]  J. Kornegay,et al.  Ventral decompression for caudal cervical disk herniation in large- and giant-breed dogs. , 1982, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.