The character of high-frequency strong ground motion

Abstract Analysis of more than 300 horizontal components of ground acceleration written by the San Fernando earthquake, eight other moderate-to-large California earthquakes, and seven Oroville aftershocks reveal that these acceleration time histories are, to a very good approximation, band-limited white Gaussian noise within the S -wave arrival window; the band limitation is defined by the spectral corner frequency f 0 and f max , the highest frequency passed by the accelerograph or the Earth9s attenuation, and the S -wave arrival window is (0 ≦ t − R/β ≦ T d ), where R is distance, β is shear-wave velocity, and T d is the faulting duration. An examination of the root-mean-square acceleration ( a rms ) characteristics of these records for 0 ≦ t − R/β ≦ T d in terms of the relation a rms = 0.85 ( 2 π ) 106 2 Δ σ ϕ R f max f o where Δ σ is the earthquake stress drop, yields the surprising result that all 16 earthquakes have stress drops, as determined by record values of a rms , very nearly equal to 100 bars (within a factor of 2). The source dependence of a rms thus depends solely on the parameter 1 / f o , which increases only as the one-sixth power of seismic moment for constant stress drop earthquakes. Put another way, model and record a rms are in agreement within a factor of 2 approximately 85 per cent of the time for Δσ = 100 bars and knowledge of 1 / f o . On the basis that acceleration time histories are finite-duration, band-limited, white Gaussian noise, for any of which a rms is fixed by Δσ = 100 bars and 1 / f o , we can estimate the peak accelerations ( a max ) for all of these records with considerable accuracy (50 per cent or less). The relation is a max = a rms 2 In ( 2 f max f o ) , where a rms is defined above. With less accuracy, this relation fits the peak acceleration set of Hanks and Johnson (1976) as well, again with Δσ = 100 bars. At a fixed, close distance, we determine the magnitude dependence of a max to be log a max ∝ 0.30 M for 4 ≲ M = M L ≲ 6 1 2 , close to that recently determined empirically by Joyner and Boore (1981) for 5.0 ≦ M ≦ 7.7, their coefficient on M (moment magnitude) being 0.25 ± 0.04. In the model presented here, the magnitude dependence of peak acceleration is a function of faulting duration alone; larger earthquakes have larger peak accelerations because they last longer, not because they are intrinsically more powerful at the high frequencies controlling peak acceleration. These well-behaved characteristics of high-frequency strong ground motion also suggest that the stress differences which develop in the course of crustal faulting are comparably well behaved, both in the average stress release across the characteristic source dimension and in the spectral composition and distribution of stress differences that develop across smaller dimensions.

[1]  C. Bufe,et al.  Implication of seismicity for failure of a section of the San Andreas Fault , 1980 .

[2]  T. Heaton,et al.  A study of the strong ground motion of the Borrego Mountain, California, earthquake , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Source parameters of southern California earthquakes , 1973 .

[4]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[5]  T. Hanks,et al.  Shear-wave velocity structure near Oroville, California , 1978 .

[6]  The local magnitude M L of the Kern County earthquake of July 21, 1952 , 1978 .

[7]  J. Tchalenko Similarities between Shear Zones of Different Magnitudes , 1970 .

[8]  T. Hanks,et al.  Strong-motion accelerograms of the Oroville aftershocks and peak acceleration data , 1978, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  b values and ω−γ seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high‐frequency strong ground motion , 1979 .

[10]  John Beauchamp Berrill A study of high-frequency strong ground motion from the San Fernando earthquake , 1975 .

[11]  T. Hanks,et al.  Seismic Moments of the Larger Earthquakes of the Southern California Region , 1975 .

[12]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[13]  P. C. Jennings,et al.  Determination of local magnitude, ML, from strong-motion accelerograms , 1978 .

[14]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  The use of body-wave spectra in the determination of seismic-source parameters , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  T. Heaton,et al.  PREDICTABILITY OF STRONG GROUND MOTION IN THE IMPERIAL VALLEY: MODELING THE M4.9, NOVEMBER 4, 1976 BRAWLEY EARTHQUAKE , 1978 .

[16]  A. Nur Nonuniform friction as a physical basis for earthquake mechanics , 1978 .

[17]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[18]  D. Andrews A stochastic fault model: 2. Time‐dependent case , 1981 .

[19]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Peak acceleration, velocity, and displacement from strong-motion records , 1980 .

[20]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Complexity of energy release during the Imperial Valley, California, earthquake of 1940 , 1970 .

[21]  J. Boatwright Quasi-dynamic models of simple earthquakes: Application to an aftershock of the 1975 Oroville, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[22]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Strong ground motion of the San Fernando, California, earthquake: Ground displacements , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[23]  G. Mellman,et al.  Inversion of the body waves from the Borrego Mountain earthquake to the source mechanism , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[24]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Observations and estimation of long‐period strong ground motion in the los angeles basin , 1976 .

[25]  J. Brune Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes , 1970 .

[26]  D. V. Seggern A random stress model for seismicity statistics and earthquake prediction , 1980 .

[27]  F. E. Udwadia,et al.  Parkfield, California, earthquake of June 27, 1966: A three-dimensional moving dislocation , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[28]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Geophysical assessment of peak accelerations , 1976 .

[29]  George W. Housner,et al.  Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes , 1947 .

[30]  M. E. O'neill,et al.  Aftershocks of the 1966 Parkfield-Cholame, California, earthquake: A detailed study , 1970 .

[31]  A. McGarr,et al.  Analysis of peak ground motion in terms of a model of inhomogeneous faulting , 1981 .

[32]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case , 1980 .

[33]  D. Boore,et al.  Simulation of strong-motion displacements using surface-wave modal superposition , 1978 .

[34]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration , 1981 .

[35]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and stresses that drive plate motions , 1977 .

[36]  A. G. Brady,et al.  Strong-Motion Accelerograms of the Oroville, California, aftershocks: Data processing and the aftershock of 0350 August 6, 1975 , 1980 .

[37]  R. Mcguire,et al.  Four definitions of strong motion duration: their predictability and utility for seismic hazard analysis , 1979 .

[38]  Robin K. McGuire,et al.  RMS accelerations and spectral amplitudes of strong ground motion during the San Fernando, California earthquake , 1980 .

[39]  E. Vanmarcke,et al.  Strong-motion duration of earthquakes , 1977 .

[40]  T. Hanks,et al.  A graphical representation of seismic source parameters , 1972 .