Exploiting arm posture synergies in activities of daily living to control the wrist rotation in upper limb prostheses: A feasibility study

Although significant technological advances have been made in the last forty years, natural and effortless control of upper limb prostheses is still an open issue. Commercially available myoelectric prostheses present limited Degrees of Freedom (DoF) mainly because of the lack of available and reliable independent control signals from the human body. Thus, despite the crucial role that an actuated wrist could play in a transradial prosthesis in terms of avoiding compensatory movements, commercial hand prostheses present only manually adjustable passive wrists or actuated rotators controlled by (unnatural) sequential control strategies. In the present study we investigated the synergies between the humeral orientation with respect to the trunk and the forearm pronation/supination angles during the execution of a wide range of activities of daily living, in healthy subjects. Our results showed consistent postural synergies between the two selected body segments for almost the totality of the activities of daily living under investigation. This is a promising result because these postural synergies could be exploited to automatically control the wrist rotator unit in transradial prostheses improving the fluency and the dexterity of the amputee.

[1]  I. Kapandji The Physiology of the Joints , 1988 .

[2]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Synergic analysis of upper limb target-reaching movements. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Classification of Simultaneous Movements Using Surface EMG Pattern Recognition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Harold H. Sears,et al.  Electric Wrist Rotation in Proportional-Controlled Systems , 1998 .

[6]  C. Fraser,et al.  An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees , 1998, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  Richard F. Weir,et al.  THE INTRINSIC HAND – A 22 DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM ARTIFICIAL HAND-WRIST REPLACEMENT , 2008 .

[8]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Is it Finger or Wrist Dexterity That is Missing in Current Hand Prostheses? , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Christina Rock Gambrell Overuse Syndrome and the Unilateral Upper Limb Amputee: Consequences and Prevention , 2008 .

[10]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  Dario Farina,et al.  Intuitive, Online, Simultaneous, and Proportional Myoelectric Control Over Two Degrees-of-Freedom in Upper Limb Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Jacob L. Segil,et al.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  Stephanie L Carey,et al.  Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[16]  J. Thonnard,et al.  ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.