Defining osteoarthritis of the hand for epidemiological studies: the Chingford Study.

OBJECTIVES--To explore the relative merits of clinical and radiological examination in defining hand osteoarthritis (OA) for epidemiological purposes. METHODS--A total of 976 women aged 45-64 years were selected from the general population and underwent a structured interview, clinical examination of the hand joints and radiography of the hands and knees. The inter-relationship of the clinical and radiological findings was examined, and also the association of each with hand symptoms and the presence of knee OA. RESULTS--Clinical and radiographic signs of hand OA generally correlated with each other, and each was associated with hand symptoms to a similar degree. When analysed in combination, they were only marginally better at predicting symptoms than when tested individually. However, when they were examined in relation to radiographic features of knee OA, there was a significantly stronger association with radiographic features of hand OA than with clinical features. CONCLUSIONS--Hand radiology provides a better overall assessment of osteoarthritis than physical examination of the interphalangeal joints or carpo-metacarpal joint; in situations where radiology is not available clinical examination is a viable substitute.

[1]  T. Spector,et al.  Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis in population studies: whither Kellgren and Lawrence? , 1993, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  T. Spector,et al.  The relationship of obesity, fat distribution and osteoarthritis in women in the general population: the Chingford Study. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  C. Cooper,et al.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  Roland W. Moskowitz,et al.  Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical Management , 1992 .

[5]  A. Silman,et al.  Clinical signs of early osteoarthritis: reproducibility and relation to x ray changes in 541 women in the general population. , 1991, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  M. Hochberg Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: current concepts and new insights. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[7]  Menkès Cj Radiographic criteria for classification of osteoarthritis. , 1991 .

[8]  W. Murphy,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  M. Hochberg,et al.  New radiographic grading scales for osteoarthritis of the hand. Reliability for determining prevalence and progression. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  A. Cats,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. , 1989, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  R. Acheson,et al.  New Haven survey of joint diseases. XII. Distribution and symptoms of osteoarthrosis in the hands with reference to handedness. , 1970, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Osteo-Arthrosis: Prevalence in the Population and Relationship between Symptoms and X-ray Changes , 1966 .

[13]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  S. Cobb,et al.  The relation of symptoms to osteoarthritis. , 1957, Journal of chronic diseases.

[15]  C. Menkes Radiographic criteria for classification of osteoarthritis. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[16]  J. Froelich Imaging of fractures: stress and occult. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Osteo-Arthrosis: Prevalence in the Population and Relationship between Symptoms and X-ray Changes , 1966, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.