Empirical methods to compensate for a view-angle-dependent brightness gradient in AVIRIS imagery☆

Abstract A view-angle-dependent brightness gradient was observed in an AVIRIS image of a forested region in Oregon's Cascade Mountains. A method of removing the view-angle effect was sought that would not alter the radiometric integrity of the image, and which would require minimal ancillary information. Four methods were tested and evaluated in terms of remaining brightness gradient and in terms of retention of spectral characteristics. All methods used a quadratic fitting equation to model the changes in brightness across view angles. Other descriptive coefficients were calculated to aid in interpretation. The observed view-angle effect varied with wavelength in a manner consistent with predictions of bidirectional reflectance distribution function characteristics for vegetation. View-angle effects were determined to contain both additive and multiplicative components, with multiplicative components being strong in the chlorophyll absorption region. The view-angle effect in a given pixel was a function of both an underlying viewangle response determined by surface structure and the inherent brightness of that pixel. The most successful compensation method was the one that best accounted for broad differences between pixels in these two components. Despite the simplifying assumptions necessary for empirical view-atigle correction techniques, they can still be useful for hyperspectral remote-sensing data in situations where the view-angle brightness variations would mask variance useful for extracting scene information.

[1]  D. Leckie,et al.  Data Processing and Analysis for MIFUCAM: A Trial of MEIS Imagery for Forest Inventory Mapping , 1995 .

[2]  C. C. Grier,et al.  Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets , 1977 .

[4]  H. V. Gelder The Netherlands , 2004, Constitutions of Europe (2 vols.).

[5]  J. Irons,et al.  Multiple-Angle Observations of Reflectance Anisotropy from an Airborne Linear Array Sensor , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Kriebel Kt,et al.  Measured spectral bidirectional reflection properties of four vegetated surfaces. , 1978 .

[7]  J. Norman,et al.  Contrasts among Bidirectional Reflectance of Leaves, Canopies, and Soils , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Donald G. Leckie,et al.  Factors affecting defoliation assessment using airborne multispectral scanner data , 1987 .

[9]  J. Cihlar,et al.  AVHRR bidirectional reflectance effects and compositing , 1994 .

[10]  R. D. Jackson,et al.  Directional reflectance factor distributions of a cotton row crop , 1984 .

[11]  Thomas F. Eck,et al.  Reflectance anisotropy for a spruce-hemlock forest canopy , 1994 .

[12]  Mary E. Martin,et al.  Determining Forest Species Composition Using High Spectral Resolution Remote Sensing Data , 1998 .

[13]  Wallace M. Porter,et al.  The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1993 .

[14]  F. Bonn,et al.  Evaluation and correction of viewing angle effects on satellite measurements of bidirectional reflectance , 1985 .

[15]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Directional Reflectance Distributions of a Hardwood and Pine Forest Canopy , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  L. Biehl,et al.  Variation in spectral response of soybeans with respect to illumination, view, and canopy geometry , 1984 .

[17]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  A new technique to measure the spectral properties of conifer needles , 1989 .

[18]  Mary E. Martin,et al.  Measurements of foliar chemistry using laboratory and airborne high spectral resolution visible and infrared data , 1994 .

[19]  A. Goetz,et al.  Software for the derivation of scaled surface reflectances from AVIRIS data , 1992 .

[20]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  Multispectral bidirectional reflectance of northern forest canopies with the advanced solid-state array spectroradiometer (ASAS)☆ , 1994 .

[21]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Normalization of sun/view angle effects using spectral albedo-based vegetation indices , 1995 .

[22]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Modeling bidirectional radiance measurements collected by the advanced Solid-State Array Spectroradiometer (ASAS) over oregon transect conifer forests☆ , 1994 .

[23]  G. Campbell,et al.  Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. , 1985, Applied optics.

[24]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  An off-nadir-pointing imaging spectroradiometer for terrestrial ecosystem studies , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Darrel L. Williams A comparison of spectral reflectance properties at the needle, branch, and canopy level for selected Conifer species , 1991 .

[26]  J. Kleman,et al.  Directional reflectance factor distributions for two forest canopies , 1987 .

[27]  L. F. Johnson Multiple view zenith angle observations of reflectance from ponderosa pine stands , 1994 .

[28]  D. Kimes Dynamics of directional reflectance factor distributions for vegetation canopies. , 1983, Applied optics.

[29]  R. F. Nalepka,et al.  Signature extension techniques applied to multispectral scanner data. , 1973 .

[30]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.