Delphi Survey on the Current and Future Korean Guidelines for Isoniazid-Monoresistant Tuberculosis

Purpose Isoniazid-monoresistant tuberculosis (Hr-TB) has emerged as a global challenge, necessitating detailed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. We aim to consolidate the Korean guidelines for Hr-TB management by gathering expert opinions and reaching a consensus. Patients and Methods A conventional Delphi method involving two rounds of surveys was conducted with 96 experts selected based on their clinical and research experience and involvement in nationwide tuberculosis studies and development of the Korean guidelines on tuberculosis. The survey consisted of three sections of questionnaires on diagnosis, treatment, and general opinions on Hr-TB. Results Among the 96 experts, 72 (75%) participated in the two rounds of the survey. A majority of experts (96%) strongly agreed on the necessity of molecular drug susceptibility testing (DST) for isoniazid and rifampin resistance in all tuberculosis patients and emphasized the importance of interpreting mutation types (inhA or katG) and additional molecular DST for fluoroquinolones for confirmed isoniazid-resistant cases. Over 95.8% of experts recommended treating Hr-TB with a combination of rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and levofloxacin for six months, without exceeding 12 months unless necessary. They also acknowledged the drawbacks of long-term pyrazinamide use due to its side effects and agreed on shortening its duration by extending the duration of the rest of the treatment with a modified combination of choice. Conclusion This Delphi survey enabled Korean tuberculosis experts to reach a consensus on diagnosing and treating Hr-TB. These findings will be valuable for developing the upcoming revised Korean guidelines for Hr-TB management.

[1]  J. Myong,et al.  Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among participants of the national LTBI screening program in South Korea – A problem of low coverage rate with current LTBI strategy , 2023, Frontiers in Public Health.

[2]  S. H. Lee,et al.  Comparison of different regimens with or without fluoroquinolone in isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: A multicenter cohort study , 2022, PloS one.

[3]  Sohee Park,et al.  Author Correction: Hidden loss to follow-up among tuberculosis patients managed by public–private mix institutions in South Korea , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[4]  T. Shim,et al.  Early Bactericidal Activity of Delpazolid (LCB01-0371) in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis , 2021, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[5]  D. Kim,et al.  Developing a Diagnostic Bundle for Bronchiectasis in South Korea: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study , 2021, Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[6]  S. H. Lee,et al.  Age-stratified anti-tuberculosis drug resistance profiles in South Korea: a multicenter retrospective study , 2020, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[7]  K. Floyd,et al.  Prevalence and genetic profiles of isoniazid resistance in tuberculosis patients: A multicountry analysis of cross-sectional data , 2020, PLoS medicine.

[8]  Ross J. Harris,et al.  Fluoroquinolones and isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: implications for the 2018 WHO guidance , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.

[9]  T. Shim,et al.  Correlation between GenoType MTBDRplus Assay and Phenotypic Susceptibility Test for Prothionamide in Patients with Genotypic Isoniazid Resistance , 2018, Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[10]  Jong Sun Park,et al.  Comparison of different treatments for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. , 2018, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[11]  H. Jenkins,et al.  Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: a cause for concern? , 2017, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[12]  A. Benedetti,et al.  Treatment of isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis with first-line drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[13]  A. Catanzaro,et al.  Genetic Mutations Associated with Isoniazid Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  H. Jenkins,et al.  Quantifying the Burden and Trends of Isoniazid Resistant Tuberculosis, 1994–2009 , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  J. Winner,et al.  Evidence based approach to the treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , 2009, Infection and drug resistance.

[16]  M. Pai,et al.  GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a meta-analysis , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[17]  G. Bai,et al.  Trend of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in Korea, 1994-2004. , 2007, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[18]  M. Iseman,et al.  Tuberculosis therapy: past, present and future , 2002, European Respiratory Journal.

[19]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[20]  J. Belaiche,et al.  Deleterious influence of pyrazinamide on the outcome of patients with fulminant or subfulminant liver failure during antituberculous treatment including isoniazid , 1995, Hepatology.

[21]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.