A visual tool for ontology alignment to enable geospatial interoperability

In distributed geospatial applications with heterogeneous databases, an ontology-driven approach to data integration relies on the alignment of the concepts of a global ontology that describe the domain, with the concepts of the ontologies that describe the data in the distributed databases. Once the alignment between the global ontology and each distributed ontology is established, agreements that encode a variety of mappings between concepts are derived. In this way, users can potentially query hundreds of geospatial databases using a single query. Using our approach, querying can be easily extended to new data sources and, therefore, to new regions. In this paper, we describe the AgreementMaker, a tool that displays the ontologies, supports several mapping layers visually, presents automatically generated mappings, and finally produces the agreements.

[1]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Web Ontology Language: OWL , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[2]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches , 2005, J. Data Semant..

[3]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Schema and ontology matching with COMA++ , 2005, SIGMOD '05.

[4]  P. W. Huang,et al.  (Journal of Visual Languages and Computing,19:637-651)Spatial Inference and Similarity Retrieval of an Image Database System Based on Object's Spanning Representation , 2007 .

[5]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Semantic Granularity in Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems , 2002, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Web Ontology Language , 2004 .

[7]  Isabel F. Cruz,et al.  Semi-automatic Ontology Alignment for Geospatial Data Integration , 2004, GIScience.

[8]  Isabel F. CRUZ,et al.  Concept Level Matching of Geospatial Ontologies A methodology and tool support for semi-automatic alignment of heterogeneous geospatial ontologies , 2005 .

[9]  Yuzhong Qu,et al.  FalconAO: Aligning Ontologies with Falcon , 2005, Integrating Ontologies.

[10]  Isabel F. Cruz,et al.  Handling semantic heterogeneities using declarative agreements , 2002, GIS '02.

[11]  Brian McBride,et al.  The Resource Description Framework (RDF) and its Vocabulary Description Language RDFS , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[12]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies , 2000, KR.

[13]  Brian McBride,et al.  Jena: A Semantic Web Toolkit , 2002, IEEE Internet Comput..

[14]  Steffen Staab,et al.  International Handbooks on Information Systems , 2013 .

[15]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Inferring Complex Semantic Mappings Between Relational Tables and Ontologies from Simple Correspondences , 2005, OTM Conferences.

[16]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Experience with N3 rules , 2005, Rule Languages for Interoperability.

[17]  Laura M. Haas,et al.  Clio: a semi-automatic tool for schema mapping , 2001, SIGMOD '01.

[18]  Henrik Eriksson,et al.  The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Eduard Hovy,et al.  Combining and standardizing large- scale, practical ontologies for machine tranlation and other uses , 1998, LREC.

[20]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.