Comparative retrieval analysis of contemporary mobile and fixed unicompartmental knee bearing designs.

[1]  J. Kretzer,et al.  Bearing Thickness Is Not a Predictive Factor for Damage and Penetration in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty—A Retrieval Analysis , 2020, Materials.

[2]  T. Joyce,et al.  Analysis of the surface topography of retrieved metal-on-polyethylene reverse shoulder prostheses , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  R. Meneghini,et al.  Does Patellofemoral Disease Affect Outcomes in Contemporary Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  T. Joyce,et al.  Retrieval analysis of two contemporary total knee designs: Influence of femoral component roughness and type of polyethylene. , 2020, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[5]  J. Gill,et al.  Clinical results and 12-year survivorship of the Physica ZUK unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2019, The Knee.

[6]  K. Kang,et al.  Influence of tibiofemoral congruency design on the wear of patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis , 2019, Bone & joint research.

[7]  T. Joyce,et al.  First tribological assessment of retrieved Oxinium patellofemoral prostheses. , 2019, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[8]  K. Kim.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty , 2018, Knee surgery & related research.

[9]  T. Joyce,et al.  A comparative surface topographical analysis of explanted total knee replacement prostheses: Oxidised zirconium vs cobalt chromium femoral components. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  V. Saikko,et al.  Effect of CoCr Counterface Roughness on the Wear of UHMWPE in the Noncyclic RandomPOD Simulation , 2017 .

[11]  M. Teeter,et al.  Comparison of articular and backside polyethylene wear in mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2017, The Knee.

[12]  A. Pearle,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: state of the art , 2017, Journal of JISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.

[13]  A. Pearle,et al.  Why Do Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Fail Today? , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  T. Joyce,et al.  Changes in surface topography at the TKA backside articulation following in vivo service: a retrieval analysis , 2015, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  T. Joyce,et al.  Topographical analysis of the femoral components of ex vivo total knee replacements , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[17]  J. B. Medley,et al.  Semi-quantitative assessment methods for backside polyethylene damage in modular total knee replacements , 2012 .

[18]  D W Murray,et al.  Examination of ten fractured Oxford unicompartmental knee bearings. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  A pictographic atlas for classifying damage modes on polyethylene bearings , 2011, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[20]  E R Valstar,et al.  Polyethylene wear of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  T. Wright,et al.  Unicondylar knee retrieval analysis. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Polyethylene damage and deformation on fixed-bearing, non-conforming unicondylar knee replacements corresponding to progressive changes in alignment and fixation. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  Y. Sawae,et al.  Influence of microscopic surface asperities on the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in a knee prosthesis , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[24]  T. Joyce,et al.  Quantification of self-polishing in vivo from explanted metal-on-metal total replacements , 2011 .

[25]  D W Murray,et al.  The effect of bearing congruency, thickness and alignment on the stresses in unicompartmental knee replacements. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  P. Hernigou,et al.  Retrieved Unicompartmental Implants with Full PE Tibial Components: The Effects of Knee Alignment and Polyethylene Thickness on Creep and Wear , 2008, The open orthopaedics journal.

[27]  A. Lakdawala,et al.  The significance of surface changes on retrieved femoral components after total knee replacement. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  TRANSEPICONDYLAR AXIS IN NORMAL, VARUS, AND VALGUS KNEE , 2004 .

[29]  L. Topoleski,et al.  Surface roughness of retrieved CoCrMo alloy femoral components from PCA artificial total knee joints. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[30]  M. Mayor,et al.  The Impact of Sterilization Method on Wear in Knee Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  D W Murray,et al.  Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  L Ryd,et al.  Polyethylene wear in unicondylar knee prostheses. 106 retrieved Marmor, PCA, and St Georg tibial components compared. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.