Optical coherence tomography is highly sensitive in detecting prior optic neuritis

Objective To explore sensitivity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in detecting prior unilateral optic neuritis. Methods This is a retrospective, observational clinical study of all patients who presented from January 1, 2014, to January 6, 2017, with unilateral optic neuritis and OCT available at least 3 months after the attack. We compared OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses between affected and unaffected contralateral eyes. We excluded patients with concomitant glaucoma or other optic neuropathies. Based on analysis of normal controls, thinning was considered significant if RNFL was at least 9 µm or GCIPL was at least 6 µm less in the affected eye compared to the unaffected eye. Results Fifty-one patients (18 male and 33 female) were included in the study. RNFL and GCIPL thicknesses were significantly lower in eyes with optic neuritis compared to unaffected eyes (p < 0.001). RNFL was thinner by ≥9 µm in 73% of optic neuritis eyes compared to the unaffected eye. GCIPL was thinner by ≥6 µm in 96% of optic neuritis eyes, which was more sensitive than using RNFL (p < 0.001). When using a threshold ≤1st percentile of age-matched controls, sensitivities were 37% for RNFL and 76% for GCIPL, each of which was lower than those calculated using the intereye difference as the threshold (p < 0.01). Conclusions OCT, especially with GCIPL analysis, is a highly sensitive modality in detecting prior optic neuritis, which is made more robust by using intereye differences to approximate change. Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that OCT accurately identifies patients with prior unilateral optic neuritis.

[1]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Optimal Intereye Difference Thresholds in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness for Predicting a Unilateral Optic Nerve Lesion in Multiple Sclerosis , 2018, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[2]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  B. Uitdehaag,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography inter‐eye percentage difference for optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis , 2017, European journal of neurology.

[4]  Alexander Klistorner,et al.  Retinal layer segmentation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell analysis in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of Neurology.

[6]  R. Kardon,et al.  Avoiding Clinical Misinterpretation and Artifacts of Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of the Optic Nerve, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, and Ganglion Cell Layer , 2016, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[7]  Danjie Li,et al.  Acute ganglion cell loss during rapid visual recovery in optic neuritis , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Kardon,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell layer thinning within one month of presentation for optic neuritis , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[9]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  Optical coherence tomography reflects brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: A four‐year study , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[10]  A. Al-Hawasi,et al.  Acute optic neuritis: retinal ganglion cell loss precedes retinal nerve fiber thinning , 2015, Neurological Sciences.

[11]  Jacqueline Palace,et al.  Neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis: Seeing differences through optical coherence tomography , 2015, Multiple sclerosis.

[12]  R. Kardon,et al.  The temporal evolution of structural and functional measures after acute optic neuritis , 2015, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[13]  L. Leocani,et al.  Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials: which is more sensitive in multiple sclerosis? , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[14]  Fiona Costello,et al.  The Afferent Visual Pathway: Designing a Structural-Functional Paradigm of Multiple Sclerosis , 2013, ISRN neurology.

[15]  Shiv Saidha,et al.  Optical coherence tomography segmentation reveals ganglion cell layer pathology after optic neuritis. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Randy H. Kardon,et al.  Role of the Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Scan in Neuro-Ophthalmology , 2011, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[17]  Axel Petzold,et al.  Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Visual field profile of optic neuritis: a final follow-up report from the optic neuritis treatment trial from baseline through 15 years. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  Junqian Xu,et al.  Optical coherence tomography is less sensitive than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis , 2009, Neurology.

[20]  Laurie Dustin,et al.  Relationship between foveal threshold and visual acuity using the Humphrey visual field analyzer. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Relation of visual function to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[22]  D. Miller,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group. Management of Acute Optic Neuritis , 2022 .

[23]  J T Holladay,et al.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.

[24]  R. Alroughani,et al.  Ganglion cell analysis in acute optic neuritis. , 2016, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[25]  Gema Rebolleda,et al.  OCT: New perspectives in neuro-ophthalmology. , 2015, Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society.