The equivalence of the finite-element formulations used inflexible multibody dynamics is the focus of this investigation. Thisequivalence will be used to address several fundamental issues related tothe deformations, flexible body coordinate systems, and the geometriccentrifugal stiffening effect. Two conceptually different finite-elementformulations that lead to exact modeling of the rigid body dynamics will beused. The first one is the absolute nodal coordinateformulation in which beams and plates can be treated as isoparametricelements. This formulation leads to a constant and symmetric mass matrix andhighly nonlinear elastic forces. In this study, it is demonstrated thatdifferent element coordinate systems which are used for the convenience ofdescribing the element deformations lead to similar results as the elementsize is reduced. In particular, two element frames are used;the pinned and the tangent frames. The pinned frame has one ofits axes passing through two nodes of the element, while the tangent frame isrigidly attached to one of the ends of the element. Numerical resultsobtained using these two different frames are found tobe in good agreement as the element size decreases. The relationshipbetween the coordinates used in the absolute nodal coordinate formulationand the floating frame of reference formulation is presented. Thisrelationship can be used to obtain the highly nonlinear expression of thestrain energy used in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation from thesimple energy expression used in the floating frame of referenceformulation. It is also shown that the source of the nonlinearityis due to the finite rotation of the element. The result of the analysispresented clearly demonstrates that the instability observedin high-speed rotor analytical models due to the neglect of the geometriccentrifugal stiffening is not a problem inherent to a particular finite-element formulation. Such a problem can only be avoided by considering the known linear effect of the geometric centrifugal stiffening or by using a nonlinear elastic model as recently demonstrated. Fourier analysis of the solutions obtained in this investigation also sheds new light on the fundamental problem of the choice of the deformable body coordinate system in the floating frame of reference formulation. Another method forformulating the elastic forces in the absolute nodal coordinate formulationbased on a continuum mechanics approach is also presented.
[1]
P. Likins.
Modal method for analysis of free rotations of spacecraft.
,
1967
.
[2]
H. Ashley.
Observations on the dynamic behavior of large flexible bodies in orbit.
,
1967
.
[3]
B. J. Hsieh,et al.
Non-Linear Transient Finite Element Analysis with Convected Co--ordinates
,
1973
.
[4]
B. D. Veubeke,et al.
The dynamics of flexible bodies
,
1976
.
[5]
J. Z. Zhu,et al.
The finite element method
,
1977
.
[6]
P. Likins,et al.
Floating reference frames for flexible spacecraft
,
1977
.
[7]
C. Rankin,et al.
An element independent corotational procedure for the treatment of large rotations
,
1986
.
[8]
J. C. Simo,et al.
On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams Under Large Overall Motions—The Plane Case: Part II
,
1986
.
[9]
J. C. Simo,et al.
The role of non-linear theories in transient dynamic analysis of flexible structures
,
1987
.
[10]
T. R. Kane,et al.
Dynamics of a cantilever beam attached to a moving base
,
1987
.
[11]
M. Greenberg.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
,
1988
.
[12]
Wp Wil Koppens.
The dynamics of systems of deformable bodies
,
1989
.
[13]
Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.
Dynamics of Multibody Systems
,
2020
.
[14]
J. G. Jalón,et al.
Dynamics of flexible multibody systems using cartesian co‐ordinates and large displacement theory
,
1991
.
[15]
Olof Friberg,et al.
A method for selecting deformation modes in flexible multibody dynamics
,
1991
.
[16]
On Various Non-Linear Rod Theories for the Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Body Systems, Part I: Formulations
,
1993
.
[17]
On Various Non-Linear Rod Theories for the Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Body Systems, Part II: Applications
,
1993
.
[18]
Ahmed A. Shabana.
RESONANCE CONDITIONS AND DEFORMABLE BODY CO-ORDINATE SYSTEMS
,
1996
.
[19]
A. A. Shabana,et al.
Geometric stiffness and stability of rigid body modes
,
1997
.
[20]
Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.
APPLICATION OF THE ABSOLUTE NODAL CO-ORDINATE FORMULATION TO MULTIBODY SYSTEM DYNAMICS
,
1997
.
[21]
A. Shabana,et al.
Equivalence of the floating frame of reference approach and finite element formulations
,
1998
.