Estimating the parameters of a generalized lambda distribution

The method of moments is a popular technique for estimating the parameters of a generalized lambda distribution (GLD), but published results suggest that the percentile method gives superior results. However, the percentile method cannot be implemented in an automatic fashion, and automatic methods, like the starship method, can lead to prohibitive execution time with large sample sizes. A new estimation method is proposed that is automatic (it does not require the use of special tables or graphs), and it reduces the computational time. Based partly on the usual percentile method, this new method also requires choosing which quantile u to use when fitting a GLD to data. The choice for u is studied and it is found that the best choice depends on the final goal of the modeling process. The sampling distribution of the new estimator is studied and compared to the sampling distribution of estimators that have been proposed. Naturally, all estimators are biased and here it is found that the bias becomes negligible with sample sizes n>=2x10^3. The .025 and .975 quantiles of the sampling distribution are investigated, and the difference between these quantiles is found to decrease proportionally to 1/n. The same results hold for the moment and percentile estimates. Finally, the influence of the sample size is studied when a normal distribution is modeled by a GLD. Both bounded and unbounded GLDs are used and the bounded GLD turns out to be the most accurate. Indeed it is shown that, up to n=10^6, bounded GLD modeling cannot be rejected by usual goodness-of-fit tests.

[1]  A. Negiz,et al.  Statistical monitoring of multivariable dynamic processes with state-space models , 1997 .

[2]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Application of the generalized lambda distributions in a statistical process control methodology , 2006 .

[3]  Visa Koivunen,et al.  Source Distribution Adaptive Maximum Likelihood Estimation of ICA Model , 2000 .

[4]  R. Wilcox Comparing the variances of two independent groups. , 2002, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[5]  A. Öztürk,et al.  Least Squares Estimation of the Parameters of the Generalized Lambda Distribution , 1985 .

[6]  Thomas E. Wehrly Fitting Statistical Distributions: The Generalized Lambda Distribution and Generalized Bootstrap Methods , 2002, Technometrics.

[7]  E. Dudewicz,et al.  COMPARISON OF GLD FITTING METHODS: SUPERIORITY OF PERCENTILE FITS TO MOMENTS IN L2 NORM , 2003 .

[8]  Juha Karvanen,et al.  Characterizing the generalized lambda distribution by L-moments , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[9]  J. Filliben The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality , 1975 .

[10]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  A New Approach to Predict the Pit Depth Extreme Value of a Localized Corrosion Process , 2003 .

[11]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Application of Lambda Distributions and Bootstrap analysis to the prediction of fatigue lifetime and confidence intervals , 2006 .

[12]  Bruce W. Schmeiser,et al.  An approximate method for generating symmetric random variables , 1972, CACM.

[13]  H. L. MacGillivray,et al.  Theory & Methods: A Starship Estimation Method for the Generalized λ Distributions , 1999 .

[14]  Visa Koivunen,et al.  Adaptive Score Functions for Maximum Likelihood ICA , 2002, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[15]  Surajit Pal Evaluation of Nonnormal Process Capability Indices using Generalized Lambda Distribution , 2004 .

[16]  T. Stengos,et al.  Information-Theoretic Distribution Tests with Application to Symmetry and Normality , 2004 .

[17]  A. Tarsitano FITTING THE GENERALIZED LAMBDA DISTRIBUTION TO INCOME DATA , 2004 .

[18]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[19]  Pandu R. Tadikamalla,et al.  A Probability Distribution and its Uses in Fitting Data , 1979 .

[20]  A. Lakhany,et al.  Estimating the parameters of the generalized lambda distribution , 2000 .

[21]  C. Corrado Option Pricing Based on the Generalized Lambda Distribution , 2001 .

[22]  R. Viertl On the Future of Data Analysis , 2002 .

[23]  A. Öztürk,et al.  A Study of Fitting the Generalized Lambda Distribution to Solar Radiation Data. , 1982 .

[24]  B. L. Joiner,et al.  Some Properties of the Range in Samples from Tukey's Symmetric Lambda Distributions , 1971 .