Participants and completers in programming MOOCs

There are millions of MOOC participants who vary in gender, age, educational level, employment status, intentions, etc. Although MOOC participants’ characteristics have been studied, there is still a lack of knowledge of the divergence between the participants and completers of MOOCs with different levels of difficulty. The term ‘level of difficulty’ as used in this paper encompasses, besides the difficulty of covered topics, the variety of supportive teaching methods and different course durations. The aim of this study was to determine the demographic and social background characteristics of participants and completers in three programming MOOCs with different difficulty levels. It was found that the difficulty of a topic is related to gender, age and educational level distribution in MOOCs. According to our results, previous experience in the topic and the difficulty level of the MOOC influence completion. However, our results were less clear-cut regarding the correlation of age, education and employment status with difficulty level of MOOC. The results can be useful for MOOC instructors in supporting different participant groups, for example, by allowing more flexibility for specific participant groups.

[1]  Gloria Allione,et al.  Mass attrition: An analysis of drop out from principles of microeconomics MOOC , 2016 .

[2]  Marina Lepp,et al.  Self- and Automated Assessment in Programming MOOCs , 2016, TEA.

[3]  Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck Exploratory study of MOOC learners’ demographics and motivation: The case of students involved in groups , 2016 .

[4]  Orhan Agirdag,et al.  Demographic data of MOOC learners: Can alternative survey deliveries improve current understandings? , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Amy E. Stich,et al.  Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Justin Reich,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013 , 2014 .

[7]  Tharindu Rekha Liyanagunawardena,et al.  Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Massive Open Online Course Completion Rates Revisited: Assessment, Length and Attrition , 2015 .

[9]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Dropout rates of massive open online courses : behavioural patterns , 2014 .

[10]  Andrew A. Tawfik,et al.  What's in It for Me? Incentives, Learning, and Completion in Massive Open Online Courses , 2017 .

[11]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses , 2013, ICIS.

[12]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions , 2015 .

[13]  J. Greene,et al.  Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course , 2015 .

[14]  Gi Woong Choi,et al.  Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Does digital competence and occupational setting influence MOOC participation? Evidence from a cross-course survey , 2016, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.

[16]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[17]  Deborah L Engle,et al.  Coursera's Introductory Human Physiology Course: Factors That Characterize Successful Completion of a MOOC. , 2015 .

[18]  J. Vickers,et al.  Relationship between participants’ level of education and engagement in their completion of the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course , 2015, BMC medical education.

[19]  Neil P. Morris,et al.  Can demographic information predict MOOC learner outcomes , 2015 .

[20]  Carlos Turro,et al.  Analysis of demographics and results of student's opinion survey of a large scale mooc deployment for the spanish speaking community , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[21]  George Veletsianos,et al.  A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015 , 2016 .

[22]  Josh Gardner,et al.  Student success prediction in MOOCs , 2017, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[23]  F. Bonafini,et al.  The effects of participants’ engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC for teachers’ professional development , 2017 .

[24]  Ghada R. El Said,et al.  Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Erman Yükseltürk,et al.  Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[26]  Stephen Downes,et al.  New Models of Open and Distributed Learning , 2017 .

[27]  Sherry Y. Chen,et al.  A Cognitive Style Perspective to Handheld Devices: Customization vs. Personalization. , 2016 .

[28]  Robert F. Boruch,et al.  Moving Through MOOCs , 2014 .

[29]  Rachel B. Baker,et al.  Persistence Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015 .

[30]  Andrew J. Saltarelli,et al.  Who Takes MOOCs , 2016 .