Techno-Economic Assessment of Calcium Looping for Thermochemical Energy Storage with CO 2 Capture

: The cyclic carbonation-calcination of CaCO 3 in fluidized bed reactors not only offers a possibility for CO 2 capture but can at the same time be implemented for thermochemical energy storage (TCES), a feature which will play an important role in a future that has an increasing share of non-dispatchable variable electricity generation (e.g., from wind and solar power). This paper provides a techno-economic assessment of an industrial-scale calcium looping (CaL) process with simultaneous TCES and CO 2 capture. The process is assumed to make profit by selling dispatchable electricity and by providing CO 2 capture services to a certain nearby emitter (i.e., transport and storage of CO 2 are not accounted). Thus, the process is connected to two other facilities located nearby: a renewable non-dispatchable energy source that charges the storage and a plant from which the CO 2 in its flue gas flow is captured while discharging the storage and producing dispatchable electricity. The process, which offers the possibility of long-term storage at ambient temperature without any significant energy loss, is herein sized for a given daily energy input under certain boundary conditions, which mandate that the charging section runs steadily for one 12-h period per day and that the discharging section can provide a steady output during 24 h per day. Intercoupled mass and energy balances of the process are computed for the different process elements, followed by the sizing of the main process equipment, after which the economics of the process are computed through cost functions widely used and validated in literature. The economic viability of the process is assessed through the breakeven electricity price (BESP), payback period (PBP), and as cost per ton of CO 2 captured. The cost of the renewable energy is excluded from the study, although its potential impact on the process costs if included in the system is assessed. The sensitivities of the computed costs to the main process and economic parameters are also assessed. The results show that for the most realistic economic projections, the BESP ranges from 141 to − 20 $/MWh for different plant sizes and a lifetime of 20 years. When the same process is assessed as a carbon capture facility, it yields a cost that ranges from 45 to − 27 $/tCO 2 -captured. The cost of investment in the fluidized bed reactors accounts for most of the computed capital expenses, while an increase in the degree of conversion in the carbonator is identified as a technical goal of major importance for reducing the global cost.

[1]  P. Salatino,et al.  A novel fluidized bed “thermochemical battery” for energy storage in concentrated solar thermal technologies , 2021 .

[2]  R. Chacartegui,et al.  Scaling-up the Calcium-Looping Process for CO2 Capture and Energy Storage , 2021, KONA Powder and Particle Journal.

[3]  C. Cormos Techno-economic implications of flexible operation for super-critical power plants equipped with calcium looping cycle as a thermo-chemical energy storage system , 2020 .

[4]  Yongliang Yan,et al.  Developments in calcium/chemical looping and metal oxide redox cycles for high-temperature thermochemical energy storage: A review , 2020 .

[5]  D. N. Basu,et al.  A critical review of high-temperature reversible thermochemical energy storage systems , 2019, Applied Energy.

[6]  Changying Zhao,et al.  Technological challenges and industrial applications of CaCO3/CaO based thermal energy storage system – A review , 2019, Solar Energy.

[7]  R. Chacartegui,et al.  The Calcium-Looping (CaCO3/CaO) process for thermochemical energy storage in Concentrating Solar Power plants , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[8]  M. Romero,et al.  Solar Energy on Demand: A Review on High Temperature Thermochemical Heat Storage Systems and Materials. , 2019, Chemical reviews.

[9]  A. Muto,et al.  Demonstration of High-Temperature Calcium-Based Thermochemical Energy Storage System for use with Concentrating Solar Power Facilities , 2019 .

[10]  G. Cinti,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of calcium looping processes for low CO2 emission cement plants , 2019, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control.

[11]  V. Manović,et al.  Techno-economic feasibility assessment of calcium looping combustion using commercial technology appraisal tools , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Hadrien Benoit,et al.  Solar processing of reactive particles up to 900°C, the SOLPART project , 2018 .

[13]  R. Chacartegui,et al.  Process integration of Calcium-Looping thermochemical energy storage system in concentrating solar power plants , 2018, Energy.

[14]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels , 2018, Climate Policy.

[15]  W. Lipiński,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of solid–gas thermochemical energy storage systems for solar thermal power applications , 2018 .

[16]  Dawid P. Hanak,et al.  Economic feasibility of calcium looping under uncertainty , 2017 .

[17]  Adriano Sciacovelli,et al.  CSP plants with thermocline thermal energy storage and integrated steam generator – Techno-economic modeling and design optimization , 2017 .

[18]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Borja Arias,et al.  Calcium looping CO2 capture system for back-up power plants , 2017 .

[20]  Clifford K. Ho,et al.  A review of high-temperature particle receivers for concentrating solar power , 2016 .

[21]  Ricardo Chacartegui,et al.  Thermochemical energy storage of concentrated solar power by integration of the calcium looping process and a CO2 power cycle , 2016 .

[22]  E. Sirtori,et al.  Guide to Cost-benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 , 2014 .

[23]  A. Deydier,et al.  A review on high temperature thermochemical heat energy storage , 2014 .

[24]  G. Manzolini,et al.  CO2 capture in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle with SEWGS – Part B: Economic assessment , 2013 .

[25]  Scott Champagne,et al.  Influence of Steam Injection during Calcination on the Reactivity of CaO-Based Sorbent for Carbon Capture , 2013 .

[26]  Wojciech Lipiński,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of solar thermochemical CO2 capture via carbonation/calcination cycle with heat recovery , 2012 .

[27]  Lion Hirth The Market Value of Variable Renewables , 2012 .

[28]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Heat requirements in a calciner of CaCO3 integrated in a CO2 capture system using CaO , 2008 .

[29]  Donald R. Woods,et al.  Rules of Thumb in Engineering Practice , 2007 .

[30]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor , 2007 .

[31]  P. Salatino,et al.  An experimental characterization of Calcium Looping integrated with concentrated solar power , 2018 .

[32]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Carbon capture and storage update , 2014 .

[33]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Calcium Looping Cycle for CO2 Capture: Performance, Cost And Feasibility Analysis☆ , 2014 .

[34]  David Steen,et al.  Challenges of integrating solar and wind into the electricity grid , 2014 .

[35]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Fluidized bed technologies for near-zero emission combustion and gasification , 2013 .

[36]  Fabrizio Scala,et al.  Fluidized bed technologies for near-zero emission combustion and gasification , 2013 .

[37]  Ming Zhao,et al.  A review of techno-economic models for the retrofitting of conventional pulverised-coal power plants for post-combustion capture (PCC) of CO2 , 2013 .

[38]  G. Concentratin CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER , 2007 .

[39]  E. Muschelknautz,et al.  Abscheideleistung von Rückführzyklonen in Wirbelschichtfeuerungen , 1999 .