A faster pedigree-based generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction method for detecting gene-gene interactions.

We proposed a faster pedigree-based generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction algorithm, called PedG-MDR II (PII), to detect gene-gene interactions underlying complex traits. Inherited from our previous framework of PedGMDR (PI), PII can handle both dichotomous and continuous traits in pedigree-based designs and allows for covariate adjustment. Compared with PI, this faster version can theoretically halve the computing burden and memory requirement. To evaluate the performance of PII, we performed comprehensive simulations across a wide variety of experimental scenarios, in which we considered two study designs, discordant sib pairs and mixed families of varying size, and, for each study design, we considered five common factors that may potentially affect statistical power: minor allele frequency, missing rate of parental genotypes, covariate effect, gene-gene interaction, and scheme to adjust phenotypic outcomes. Simulations showed that PII gave well controlled type I error rates against population admixture. Under a total of 4,096 scenarios simulated, PII, in general, had a higher average power than PI for both dichotomous and continuous traits, and the advantage was more pronounced for continuous traits. PII also appeared to be less sensitive than PI to changes in the other four factors than the magnitude of genetic effects considered in this study. Applied to the Mid-South Tobacco Family study, PII detected a significant interaction with a p value of 5.4 × 10(-5) between two taster receptor genes, TAS2R16 and TAS2R38, responsible for nicotine dependence. In conclusion, PII is a faster supplementary version of our previous PI for detecting multifactor interactions.

[1]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. , 1991, British journal of addiction.

[2]  Xin Xu,et al.  Implementing a unified approach to family‐based tests of association , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[3]  Daniel Rabinowitz,et al.  A Unified Approach to Adjusting Association Tests for Population Admixture with Arbitrary Pedigree Structure and Arbitrary Missing Marker Information , 2000, Human Heredity.

[4]  N M Laird,et al.  Family-based tests of association and linkage that use unaffected sibs, covariates, and interactions. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  C. Sing,et al.  A combinatorial partitioning method to identify multilocus genotypic partitions that predict quantitative trait variation. , 2001, Genome research.

[6]  C Kooperberg,et al.  Sequence Analysis Using Logic Regression , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[7]  J. H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  Mark Leppert,et al.  Positional Cloning of the Human Quantitative Trait Locus Underlying Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiocarbamide , 2003, Science.

[9]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions , 2003, Bioinform..

[10]  D. Tregouet,et al.  Automated detection of informative combined effects in genetic association studies of complex traits. , 2003, Genome research.

[11]  T. Hastie,et al.  Classification of gene microarrays by penalized logistic regression. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[12]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Ideal discrimination of discrete clinical endpoints using multilocus genotypes , 2004, Silico Biol..

[13]  N. Cook,et al.  Tree and spline based association analysis of gene–gene interaction models for ischemic stroke , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  M. Reilly,et al.  MDR and PRP: A Comparison of Methods for High-Order Genotype-Phenotype Associations , 2005, Human Heredity.

[15]  William Shannon,et al.  Detecting epistatic interactions contributing to quantitative traits , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[16]  M. Reilly,et al.  MDR and PRP: A Comparison of Methods for High-Order Genotype-Phenotype Associations , 2005, Human Heredity.

[17]  Ming D. Li,et al.  Ethnic- and gender-specific association of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha4 subunit gene (CHRNA4) with nicotine dependence. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[18]  Ming D. Li,et al.  A genomewide search finds major susceptibility loci for nicotine dependence on chromosome 10 in African Americans. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Alison A Motsinger,et al.  The effect of reduction in cross‐validation intervals on the performance of multifactor dimensionality reduction , 2006, Genetic epidemiology.

[20]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Todd Holden,et al.  A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  J. H. Moore,et al.  A novel method to identify gene–gene effects in nuclear families: the MDR‐PDT , 2006, Genetic epidemiology.

[23]  Jun Zhu,et al.  A generalized combinatorial approach for detecting gene-by-gene and gene-by-environment interactions with application to nicotine dependence. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  Taesung Park,et al.  Log-linear model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction method to detect gene-gene interactions , 2007, Bioinform..

[25]  Ming D. Li,et al.  Bitter taste receptor gene polymorphisms are an important factor in the development of nicotine dependence in African Americans , 2008, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[26]  Jun Zhu,et al.  A combinatorial approach to detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in family studies. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  P. Phillips.  Epistasis — the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  Mark M Iles,et al.  What Can Genome-Wide Association Studies Tell Us about the Genetics of Common Disease , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[29]  Jonathan Flint,et al.  Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. , 2009, Genome research.

[30]  M. Marazita,et al.  Genome-wide Association Studies , 2012, Journal of dental research.