Ethics and Technology ‘in the Making’: An Essay on the Challenge of Nanoethics

After reviewing portions of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act that call for examination of societal and ethical issues, this essay seeks to understand how nanoethics can play a role in nanotechnology development. What can and should nanoethics aim to achieve? The focus of the essay is on the challenges of examining ethical issues with regard to a technology that is still emerging, still ‘in the making.’ The literature of science and technology studies (STS) is used to understand the nanotechnology endeavor in a way that makes room for influence by nanoethics. The analysis emphasizes: the contingency of technology and the many actors involved in its development; a conception of technology as sociotechnical systems; and, the values infused (in a variety of ways) in technology. Nanoethicists can be among the many actors who shape the meaning and materiality of an emerging technology. Nevertheless, there are dangers that nanoethicists should try to avoid. The possibility of being co-opted from working along side nanotechnology engineers and scientists is one danger that is inseparable from trying to influence. Related but somewhat different is the danger of not asking about the worthiness of the nanotechnology enterprise as a social investment in the future.

[1]  John Weckert.  Lilliputian Computer Ethics , 2002 .

[2]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  Societal Dimensions of Nanotechnology as a Trading Zone: Results from a Pilot Project , 2004 .

[3]  Thomas P. Hughes,et al.  The Electrification of America: The System Builders , 2023 .

[4]  G. Foladori,et al.  Nanotechnology and the developing world: will nanotechnology overcome poverty or widen disparities? , 2005 .

[5]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  What Counts as a 'Social and Ethical Issue' in Nanotechnology? , 2005 .

[6]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[7]  C. Cockburn,et al.  Gender and technology in the making , 1993 .

[8]  Philip Brey,et al.  Disclosive computer ethics , 2000, CSOC.

[9]  J. Law.  TECHNOLOGY AND HETEROGENEOUS ENGINEERING: THE CASE OF PORTUGUESE EXPANSION , 2018, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES.

[10]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Inside Technology) , 2003 .

[11]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[12]  R. Pinson.  Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions , 2004 .

[13]  L. Winner.  The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .

[14]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[15]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[16]  W. Patrick McCray,et al.  Will small be beautiful? Making policies for our nanotech future , 2005 .

[17]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[18]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Developing World , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[19]  A. Daar,et al.  ‘Mind the gap’: science and ethics in nanotechnology , 2003, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[20]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Discovering the nanoscale , 2004 .

[21]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .