Mechanism‐informed read‐across assessment of skin sensitizers based on SkinSensDB

ABSTRACT Integrative testing strategies using adverse outcome pathway (AOP)‐based alternative assays for assessing skin sensitizers show the potential for replacing animal testing. However, the application of alternative assays for a large number of chemicals is still time‐consuming and expensive. In order to facilitate the assessment of skin sensitizers based on integrative testing strategies, a mechanism‐informed read‐across assessment method was proposed and evaluated using data from SkinSensDB. First, the prediction performance of two integrated testing strategy models was evaluated giving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.928 and 0.837 for predicting human and LLNA data, respectively. The proposed read‐across prediction method achieves AUC values of 0.957 and 0.802 for predicting human and LLNA data, respectively, with interpretable activation statuses of AOP events. As data grows, a better prediction performance is expected. A user‐friendly tool has been constructed and integrated into SkinSensDB that is publicly accessible at http://cwtung.kmu.edu.tw/skinsensdb. HighlightsA mechanism‐informed read‐across assessment method was proposed for the assessment of skin sensitizers based on SkinSensDB.The majority vote method based on three key events performs best for predicting human and LLNA data.The proposed method is useful for predicting human data with an AUC value higher than 0.9.A user‐friendly tool is publicly accessible at http://cwtung.kmu.edu.tw/skinsensdb.

[1]  Yuri Dancik,et al.  Bayesian integrated testing strategy to assess skin sensitization potency: from theory to practice , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[2]  Hitoshi Sakaguchi,et al.  Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h‐CLAT as part of a bottom‐up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  Chun-Wei Tung,et al.  SkinSensDB: a curated database for skin sensitization assays , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[4]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Skin Sensitizers Induce Antioxidant Response Element Dependent Genes: Application to the In Vitro Testing of the Sensitization Potential of Chemicals , 2008 .

[5]  Silvia Casati,et al.  Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization? , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  C. Tung Prediction of pupylation sites using the composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  A. Groot,et al.  Patch tests with fragrance materials and preservatives , 1985, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[9]  David Allen,et al.  Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard , 2017, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[10]  Petra Kern,et al.  A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[11]  Shinn-Ying Ho,et al.  Computational identification of ubiquitylation sites from protein sequences , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Investigation of peptide reactivity of pro-hapten skin sensitizers using a peroxidase-peroxide oxidation system. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  Setsuya Aiba,et al.  Skin sensitization risk assessment model using artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[16]  H. Sakaguchi,et al.  Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines: the human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). I. Optimization of the h-CLAT protocol. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[17]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Non‐animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated? , 2018, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[18]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[19]  Hitoshi Sakaguchi,et al.  Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[20]  Peter Ertl,et al.  JSME: a free molecule editor in JavaScript , 2013, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[21]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[22]  Kristina Luthman,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[23]  Janine Ezendam,et al.  Evaluating the performance of integrated approaches for hazard identification of skin sensitizing chemicals. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  Setsuya Aiba,et al.  Artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays for prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[25]  Shinn-Ying Ho,et al.  POPISK: T-cell reactivity prediction using support vector machines and string kernels , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[26]  S. Aiba,et al.  Evaluation of CD86 expression and MHC class II molecule internalization in THP-1 human monocyte cells as predictive endpoints for contact sensitizers. , 2002, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[27]  Chun-Wei Tung,et al.  Identification of consensus biomarkers for predicting non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[28]  H. Sakaguchi,et al.  Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[29]  Takao Ashikaga,et al.  Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network‐based risk assessment model of skin sensitization , 2015, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[30]  Judy Strickland,et al.  Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy , 2015, Archives of Toxicology.

[31]  Rob J. Vandebriel,et al.  Non-animal sensitization testing: State-of-the-art , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.