Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: New methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints

Abstract We propose and evaluate the utility of an alternative method (decision boundaries) for establishing physical activity intensity-related accelerometer cutpoints. Accelerometer data collected from seventy-six 11- to 14-year-old boys during controlled bouts of moderate- and vigorous-intensity field physical activities were assessed. Mean values and standard deviations for moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities were obtained and normal equivalents generated. The decision boundary (the point of intersection of overlapping distributions) was used to create a lower-bound vigorous-intensity cutpoint. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compared the sensitivity and specificity of the new cutpoint and mean values with the actual activity. There was a 96.5% probability that participants performing vigorous-intensity physical activity were accurately classified when using the decision boundary of 6700 counts per minute, in contrast to the 50% accurately classified when the mean value was used. Inspection of the empirical ROC curve indicated that the decision boundary provided the optimal threshold to distinguish between moderate and vigorous physical activity for this dataset. In conclusion, decision boundaries reduced the error associated with determining accelerometer threshold values. Applying these methods to accelerometer data collected in specific populations will improve the precision with which accelerometer thresholds can be identified.

[1]  Darrell M. Wilson,et al.  Dance and reducing television viewing to prevent weight gain in African-American girls: the Stanford GEMS pilot study. , 2003, Ethnicity & disease.

[2]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Is the ArteACC index a valid indicator of free-living physical activity in adolescents? , 2003, Obesity research.

[3]  Ann V Rowlands,et al.  Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Sari A Acra,et al.  Predicting energy expenditure of physical activity using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[5]  Sam Kash Kachigan Statistical Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Introduction to Univariate & Multivariate Methods , 1986 .

[6]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  The Fun, Food, and Fitness Project (FFFP): the Baylor GEMS pilot study. , 2003, Ethnicity & disease.

[8]  S. Going,et al.  Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  J. Sorkin,et al.  Predictors of body fat gain in nonobese girls with a familial predisposition to obesity. , 2003, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[10]  Karsten Froberg,et al.  Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Marsha Dowda,et al.  Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. physical activity monitor in preschool children , 2001 .

[12]  Aviva Must,et al.  Relation of body composition, parental overweight, pubertal stage, and race-ethnicity to energy expenditure among premenarcheal girls. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  Anja Vogler,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2004 .

[14]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[15]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  E L Melanson,et al.  Overview of the determinants of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  J. Jakicic,et al.  The role of physical activity in prevention and treatment of body weight gain in adults. , 2002, The Journal of nutrition.

[19]  D. Schoeller,et al.  Multicomponent cross-validation of minimum weight predictions for college wrestlers. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[22]  L. Sarna,et al.  Physical activity and fatigue during radiation therapy: a pilot study using actigraph monitors. , 2001, Oncology nursing forum.

[23]  P. Freedson,et al.  Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[24]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[27]  Kuan Zhang,et al.  Measurement of human daily physical activity. , 2003, Obesity research.

[28]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[30]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Laboratory calibration and validation of the Biotrainer and Actitrac activity monitors. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  J F Nichols,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field Validation , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[32]  Alison Kirk,et al.  Effects of a 12-month physical activity counselling intervention on glycaemic control and on the status of cardiovascular risk factors in people with Type 2 diabetes , 2004, Diabetologia.

[33]  S. Going,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm girth for obesity screening in children and adolescents. , 1999, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[34]  Issa Zakeri,et al.  Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.