Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others.

Important asymmetries between self-perception and social perception arise from the simple fact that other people's actions, judgments, and priorities sometimes differ from one's own. This leads people not only to make more dispositional inferences about others than about themselves (E. E. Jones & R. E. Nisbett, 1972) but also to see others as more susceptible to a host of cognitive and motivational biases. Although this blind spot regarding one's own biases may serve familiar self-enhancement motives, it is also a product of the phenomenological stance of naive realism. It is exacerbated, furthermore, by people's tendency to attach greater credence to their own introspections about potential influences on judgment and behavior than they attach to similar introspections by others. The authors review evidence, new and old, of this asymmetry and its underlying causes and discuss its relation to other psychological phenomena and to interpersonal and intergroup conflict.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  M. Ginsberg.  Human Nature and the Social Order , 1941, Nature.

[3]  G. Ichheiser.  Misunderstandings in human relations: a study in false social perception. , 1949 .

[4]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[5]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Contemporary approaches to cognition , 1958 .

[6]  V B CLINE,et al.  INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION. , 1964, Progress in experimental personality research.

[7]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[8]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[9]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[10]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[11]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[12]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer , 1973 .

[13]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Going Beyond the Information Given , 2006 .

[14]  B. Fischoff.  Hindsight (Not Equal To) Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. , 1975 .

[15]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[16]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[17]  L. Ross.  The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[18]  L. Ross,et al.  The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process”, in Ed), Advances in Experimental Social New York, pp. . , 1977 .

[19]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[20]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[21]  The bias phenomenon in attitude attribution: Actor and observer perspectives. , 1979 .

[22]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[23]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. , 1981 .

[24]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[25]  Paul T. P. Wong,et al.  When people ask "why" questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. , 1981 .

[26]  T. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect revisited: Forewarned is not forearmed ☆ , 1981 .

[27]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[28]  S. Andersen.  Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. , 1984 .

[29]  L. Ross,et al.  Self-knowledge and social inference: I. The impact of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. , 1984 .

[30]  L. Ross,et al.  The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. , 1987 .

[32]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[33]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. , 1987 .

[34]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[35]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  J. Innes,et al.  The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the ‘third person’ effect , 1988 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[38]  D. Dunning,et al.  Ambiguity and self-evaluation: the role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability , 1989 .

[39]  L. Ross,et al.  Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  L. Ross,et al.  The overconfidence effect in social prediction. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Differential construal and the false consensus effect. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Changes in the expression and assessment of racial prejudice. , 1991 .

[43]  N. H. Berkowitz,et al.  Anticipated bias from an outgroup: An attributional analysis , 1992 .

[44]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[45]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[46]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  THIRD-PERSON EFFECT RESEARCH 1983–1992: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS , 1993 .

[47]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. , 1993 .

[48]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Opening doors : perspectives on race relations in contemporary America , 1994 .

[50]  R. Buehler,et al.  Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. , 1994 .

[51]  L. Ross,et al.  Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution , 1995 .

[52]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect , 1995 .

[53]  L. Ross,et al.  Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict , 1995 .

[54]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  G. Gigerenzer.  On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) , 1996 .

[56]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[57]  L. Ross,et al.  Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. , 1996 .

[58]  Edward S. Reed,et al.  Values and Knowledge , 1987, A Centre of Excellence.

[59]  J. Friedrich,et al.  On Seeing Oneself as Less Self-Serving than Others: The Ultimate Self-Serving Bias? , 1996 .

[60]  D. Keltner,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING? Revisionists and Traditionalists Choose an Introductory , 2022 .

[61]  John Tooby,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all , 1996 .

[62]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .

[64]  Vera Hoorens,et al.  The optimal impact phenomenon : beyond the third person effect , 1996 .

[65]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases , 1997 .

[66]  Joachim I. Krueger,et al.  Enhancement Bias in Descriptions of Self and Others , 1998 .

[67]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  D. Armor.  The illusion of objectivity: A bias in the perception of freedom from bias. , 1999 .

[69]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Naive cynicism in everyday theories of responsibility assessment : On biased assumptions of bias , 1999 .

[70]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The Perceiver as Perceived: Everyday Intuitions About the Correspondence Bias , 1999 .

[71]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[72]  C. Heath,et al.  On the Social Psychology of Agency Relationships: Lay Theories of Motivation Overemphasize Extrinsic Incentives. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[73]  N. Epley,et al.  Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  D T Gilbert,et al.  The illusion of external agency. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Empathy Gaps between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endowment Effect , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[76]  L. Ross,et al.  You don't know me, but I know you: the illusion of asymmetric insight. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  D. Schacter,et al.  Do Amnesics Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance Reduction? The Role of Explicit Memory and Attention in Attitude Change , 2001, Psychological science.

[78]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now , 2002 .

[79]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[80]  L. Ross,et al.  The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others , 2002 .

[81]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the was on Selection Task , 2002 .

[82]  T. Wilson.  Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious , 2002 .

[83]  K. White,et al.  Intuitions about situational correction in self and others. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[84]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety , 2003 .

[85]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment: The Road to Self-Enhancement Is Paved with Good Intentions , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[86]  D. Funder,et al.  Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[87]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Peering Into the Bias Blind Spot: People’s Assessments of Bias in Themselves and Others , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.