Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change

When one form replaces another over time in a changing language, the new form does not occur equally often in all linguistic contexts. Linguists have generally assumed that those contexts in which the new form is more common are those in which the form first appears and in which it advances most rapidly. However, evidence from several linguistic changes (most importantly the rise of the periphrastic auxiliary do in late Middle English) shows that the general assumption is false. Instead, at least for syntactic cases, change seems to proceed at the same rate in all contexts. Contexts change together because they are merely surface manifestations of a single underlying change in grammar. Differences in frequency of use of a new form across contexts reflect functional and stylistic factors, which are constant across time and independent of grammar.

[1]  On the origin and early development of the auxiliary do , 1938 .

[2]  Fernand Mossé,et al.  A handbook of Middle English , 1952 .

[3]  C. Osgood,et al.  Psycholinguistics: A Survey of Theory and Research Problems , 1955 .

[4]  A. Ellegård.  The auxiliary do : the establishment and regulation of its use in English , 1955 .

[5]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[6]  Frederik Theodoor Visser,et al.  An Historical Syntax of the English Language , 2002 .

[7]  ‘Have’ and ‘Have Got’ , 1964 .

[8]  B. Kottler,et al.  A concordance to five Middle English poems : Cleanness, St. Erkenwald, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Patience, Pearl , 1966 .

[9]  W. Labov,et al.  Empirical foundations for a theory of language change , 2014 .

[10]  Charles James Nice Bailey.  Variation and linguistic theory , 1973 .

[11]  William Labov,et al.  What is a Linguistic Fact , 1975 .

[12]  Eliot B. Spiess,et al.  Genes in Populations , 1977 .

[13]  David Sankoff,et al.  Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods , 1978 .

[14]  F. Parker,et al.  ON SYNTACTIC CHANGE , 1978 .

[15]  M. Rydén.  An introduction to the historical study of English syntax , 1979 .

[16]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Principles of diachronic syntax , 1979 .

[17]  David Sankoff,et al.  A Formal Grammar for Code-Switching. CENTRO Working Papers 8. , 1980 .

[18]  A. Akmajian,et al.  An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence , 1981 .

[19]  Susan Steele,et al.  An encyclopedia of AUX , 1981 .

[20]  David Sankoff,et al.  A formal grammar for code‐switching 1 , 1981 .

[21]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Processing of Sentences With Intra-Sentential Code-Switching , 1982, COLING.

[22]  Anthony Warner.  Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax: A Study of the Wyclifite , 1982 .

[23]  Anthony Warner,et al.  Principles of diachronic syntax , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.

[24]  Brian Parker,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[25]  Complementation in middle english and the methodology of historical syntax: Anthony Warner, Croom Helm, London. 1982. [ix] + 266 p. , 1984 .

[26]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  The syntax of verbs , 1984 .

[27]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Topicalization and Left‐Dislocation: A Functional Analysis a , 1984 .

[28]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[29]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Natural language parsing: Processing of sentences with intrasentential code switching , 1985 .

[30]  The origins of periphrastic DO: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered , 1985 .

[31]  Ian G. Roberts,et al.  Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries , 1985 .

[32]  SYNTACTIC VARIATION AND CHANGE: THE CASE OF DO IN QUESTIONS IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH , 1986 .

[33]  Marianne Adams.  From Old French to the theory of pro-drop , 1987 .

[34]  Marianne Adams.  Old French, null subjects, and verb second phenomena , 1987 .

[35]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Discourse analysis: a part of the study of linguistic competence , 1988 .

[36]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[37]  P. Hirschbuhler,et al.  Remarques sur les sujets nuls en subordonnées en ancien et en moyen français in Aspects de la syntaxe historique du français. , 1988 .

[38]  Anthony Kroch,et al.  The Isolability of Syntactic Processing , 1989 .

[39]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  Function and grammar in the history of English , 1989 .

[40]  Jean-Yves Pollock.  Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[41]  D. Lightfoot.  The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  Beatrice Santorini.  The generalization of the verb-second constraint in the history of Yiddish , 1989 .