Color appearance under chromatic adaptation varied along theoretically significant axes in color space.

Changes in color appearance caused by chromatic adaptation were measured with a wide range of adapting fields. Observers viewed a 39'-55' annular test field composed of an admixture of lights from the red phosphor and the green phosphor of a CRT. The annular mixture field was centered and superimposed upon a 4.7 degrees steady, circular background field. After the observer was completely adapted to the background, the luminance of the red phosphor in the test was held fixed while the observer adjusted the luminance of the green phosphor until the test appeared neither reddish nor greenish. Twenty-two equiluminant backgrounds (4.5 cd/m2, approximately 50 Td) were systematically selected along two axes in Judd chromaticity space. One axis was along tritanopic confusion lines, with middle-wavelength-sensitive- (M-) and long-wavelength-sensitive- (L-) cone stimulation held constant. The other axis maintained constant short-wavelength-sensitive- (S-) cone stimulation. The results show that adapting backgrounds that were varied along tritanopic confusion lines do not have a differential effect on color appearance at high test levels (well above the adapting level). At lower test levels there is a systematic change in color appearance of the test light, which is quantitatively described by additive redness. Along constant S-cone-stimulation lines, adapting backgrounds differentially affect color appearance in a systematic way, reflecting changes in receptoral gain and the additive contribution. The measurements taken with adapting fields throughout color space are described by the two-process model of chromatic adaptation.

[1]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  S. Shevell,et al.  Color perception under chromatic adaptation: Red/green equilibria with adapted short-wavelength-sensitive cones , 1988, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[4]  J. Walraven.  Discounting the background—the missing link in the explanation of chromatic induction , 1976, Vision Research.

[5]  V. C. Smith,et al.  The abney effect: Chromaticity coordinates of unique and other constant hues , 1984, Vision Research.

[6]  C. R. Ingling.  The spectral sensitivity of the opponent-color channels , 1977, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Shevell.  The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception , 1978, Vision Research.

[8]  Y. Ejima,et al.  Interaction between short- and longer-wavelength cones in hue cancellation codes: Nonlinearities of hue cancellation as a function of stimulus intensity , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Cardinal directions of color space , 1982, Vision Research.

[10]  Steven K. Shevell,et al.  Redness from short-wavelength-sensitive cones does not induce greenness , 1992, Vision Research.

[11]  C. M. Cicerone,et al.  Opponent-process additivity--I: red-green equilibria. , 1974, Vision research.

[12]  James Larimer,et al.  Red/green opponent colors equilibria measured on chromatic adapting fields: Evidence for gain changes and restoring forces , 1981, Vision Research.

[13]  David H. Krantz,et al.  Opponent-process additivity—III Effect of moderate chromatic adaptation , 1975, Vision Research.

[14]  D. Jameson,et al.  An opponent-process theory of color vision. , 1957, Psychological review.

[15]  S. Shevell.  Color perception under chromatic adaptation: Equilibrium yellow and long-wavelength adaptation , 1982, Vision Research.

[16]  B. Drum.  Additive effect of backgrounds in chromatic induction , 1981, Vision Research.

[17]  W. Cowan,et al.  Changes in perceived color due to chromatic interactions , 1982, Vision Research.

[18]  E. Adelson.  Looking at the world through a rose-colored ganzfeld , 1981, Vision Research.

[19]  Steven K. Shevell,et al.  Unambiguous evidence for the additive effect in chromatic adaptation , 1980, Vision Research.

[20]  R. F.,et al.  Mathematical Statistics , 1944, Nature.

[21]  J. Walraven,et al.  No additive effect of backgrounds in chromatic induction , 1979, Vision Research.