Reliability of hearing thresholds: computer-automated testing with ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.

This study was conducted to document test-retest reliability of hearing thresholds using our computer-automated tinnitus matching technique and Etymotic ER-4B Canal Phone insert earphones. The research design involved repeated threshold measurements both within and between sessions, and testing to evaluate the potential effect of eartip removal and reinsertion. Twenty normal-hearing subjects were evaluated over two testing sessions with the use of a fully automated protocol for determining thresholds with 1-dB precision. Thresholds were first obtained at 0.5-16.0 kHz, in one-third octave frequency steps (16 test frequencies). The octave frequencies were then retested, first without removing the eartips, then after eartip removal and replacement. Responses between sessions differed by an average of 2.5 dB across all 16 test frequencies, and 91.5 percent of the repeated thresholds varied within +/-5 dB (98.1 percent within +/-10 dB). Reliability of within-sessions thresholds was also good, and there was no effect of eartip removal and replacement.

[1]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  A New Audiometer , 1947 .

[2]  B. Erlandsson,et al.  The reliability of Békésy sweep audiometry recording and effects of the earphone position. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[3]  W. A. Cooper,et al.  Reference threshold sound-pressure levels for the TDH-50 and ER-3A earphones. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. Sklare,et al.  Interaural attenuation for tubephone insert earphones. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[5]  G. Atherley,et al.  The Reliability of Repeated Auditory Threshold Determination , 1963, British journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  P A Smith,et al.  Comparison of manual and computer-controlled self-recorded audiometric methods for serial monitoring of hearing. , 1989, British journal of audiology.

[7]  L. S. Whittle,et al.  A comparison of self-recording and manual audiometry: Some systematic effects shown by unpractised subjects , 1973 .

[8]  R. Brown.  Experimental Studies on the Reliability of Audiometry , 1948, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[9]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[10]  J A Henry,et al.  Reliability and validity of high-frequency (8-20 kHz) thresholds obtained on a computer-based audiometer as compared to a documented laboratory system. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  B. W. Lawton,et al.  Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  L. Sieminski.  Automatic audiometry. , 1978, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[13]  G. Studebaker.  Intertest variability and the air-bone gap. , 1967, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[14]  W. Dreschler,et al.  The role of high-frequency audiometry in early detection of ototoxicity. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[15]  Reader Aids,et al.  Estimating the Reliability , 1991 .

[16]  J. Henry,et al.  Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  J. Mills,et al.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in older adults. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  I. W. Mair,et al.  High-frequency audiometry. Normative studies and preliminary experiences. , 1985, Scandinavian audiology.

[19]  M. Killion,et al.  Clinical Use of an Insert Earphone , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[20]  D M Green,et al.  Reliability of pure-tone thresholds at high frequencies. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Vernon,et al.  Identification of Tinnitus: A Plea for Standardization , 1984, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[22]  R S Tyler,et al.  A comparison of manual methods for measuring hearing levels. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[23]  R. Hinchcliffe,et al.  Comparison of the Auditory Threshold as Measured by Individual Pure Tone and by Békésy Audiometry , 1957 .

[24]  S B Luks,et al.  Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[25]  D. Lilly,et al.  On the Routine Use of TubephoneTM Insert Earphones. , 1993, American journal of audiology.

[26]  S. Hickling.  THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PURE TONE CLINICAL AUDIOMETRY. , 1964, The New Zealand medical journal.

[27]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  High-frequency audiometry: test reliability and procedural considerations. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  T. Frank,et al.  Repeatability of high-frequency thresholds. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[29]  G. Herman.  Variability of the Absolute Auditory Threshold: A Psychophysical Study , 1953 .

[30]  J A Henry,et al.  Reliability of tinnitus loudness matches under procedural variation. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[31]  W Melnick,et al.  American National Standard specifications for audiometers. , 1971, ASHA.

[32]  S. Lifshitz.  Fluctuation of the Hearing Threshold , 1939 .

[33]  Gauz Mt,et al.  High-frequency Bekesy audiometry: III. Reliability and validity revisited. , 1981 .

[34]  A. Ciocco.  IV Audiometric Studies on School Children , 1937 .

[35]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On the Effect of Practice and Motivation on the Threshold of Audibility , 1958 .

[36]  F. Lindgren.  A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[37]  E. A. G. Shaw,et al.  Wave effects and pressure distribution in the ear canal near the tympanic membrane , 1982 .

[38]  D. M. Green,et al.  Calibration of ear canals for audiometry at high frequencies. , 1987, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  A. Stuart,et al.  Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[40]  E H Berger,et al.  Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  C. K. Myers,et al.  Experiments on Fluctuation of Auditory Acuity , 1954 .

[42]  W. D. Currier.  OFFICE NOISES AND THEIR EFFECT ON AUDIOMETRY , 1943 .

[43]  W. Hughson,et al.  Inherent accuracy of a series of repeated clinical audiograms , 1940 .

[44]  T. Letowski,et al.  High-frequency threshold measurements using insert earphones. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[45]  M. Meikle,et al.  Tinnitus masking:unresolved problems. , 2008, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[46]  High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[47]  T. Frank,et al.  High-frequency hearing thresholds in young adults using a commercially available audiometer. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[48]  J. Corso,et al.  Methodological aspects of auditory threshold measurements. , 1958, Journal of Experimental Psychology.