Space use in lions, Panthera leo, in the Selous Game Reserve: social and ecological factors

Abstract. Habitat qualities, such as food supply or access to refuges, often influence home-range size. Furthermore, such qualitative differences usually lead to conspecific competition over space, which can be an important factor in determining the distribution of individuals within populations. In carnivores, patterns of resource dispersion are hypothesized to determine home range-size and group size. But in contests over space (or other resources), larger groups usually dominate smaller ones, and group size should therefore also affect home-range size. Here I describe the space use of lions, Panthera leo, in the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania, and ask whether space use is related to pride size, habitat, or relatedness. Home ranges varied in size, but size showed no correlation to number of adult females in the pride or to habitat type. Lions exhibited a significant preference for riverine and short-grass habitat, and a significant avoidance of acacia woodland. Habitat preference ratios largely reflected prey availability in each habitat. Outer areas, as well as core areas of home ranges, were often used by two or more prides. Overlaps showed no correlation to relatedness among prides or habitat type. Thus, whereas home-range sizes and overlaps were determined by factors that could not be revealed by demographic factors or analyses of habitat composition or genetic structure, lion space use within each home range seemed driven mostly by prey availability, which mainly varies with habitat type.

[1]  M. D. Bitetti,et al.  Home-range use by the tufted capuchin monkey ( Cebus apella nigritus ) in a subtropical rainforest of Argentina , 2001 .

[2]  D. Queller,et al.  Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[3]  Craig Packer,et al.  The Evolution of Sex-Biased Dispersal in Lions , 1987 .

[4]  J. L. Gittleman Carnivore Group Living: Comparative Trends , 1989 .

[5]  F. Knowlton,et al.  Coyote space use in relation to prey abundance , 1991 .

[6]  J. Stephens,et al.  Analytical DNA fingerprinting in lions: parentage, genetic diversity, and kinship. , 1991, The Journal of heredity.

[7]  M. Sandell Movement patterns of male stoats Mustela erminea during the mating season: differences in relation to social status , 1986 .

[8]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The ecology of carnivore social behaviour , 1983, Nature.

[9]  F. Smith,et al.  A Remote Method for Obtaining Skin Biopsy Samples , 1987 .

[10]  C. Packer,et al.  Cooperation in male lions: kinship, reciprocity or mutualism? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  V. Gelder,et al.  The Serengeti Lion , 1973 .

[12]  S. Creel,et al.  Effects of kinship on territorial conflicts among groups of lions, Panthera leo , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  S. Creel,et al.  Deriving dispersal distances from genetic data , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  M. Ashburner A Laboratory manual , 1989 .

[15]  Theodore Stankowich,et al.  The African Wild Dog: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation , 2003 .

[16]  C. Packer,et al.  Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  L. Mech,et al.  The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species , 1970 .

[18]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .