Finding the Optimal Time Window for Increased Classification Accuracy during Motor Imagery

Motor imagery classification using electroencephalography is based on feature extraction over a length of time, and different configurations of settings can alter the performance of a classifier. Nevertheless, there is a lack of standardized settings for motor imagery classification. This work analyzes the effect of age on motor imagery training performance for two common spatial pattern-based classifier pipelines and various configurations of timing parameters, such as epochs, windows, and offsets. Results showed significant (p ≤ 0.01) inverse correlations between performance and feature quantity, as well as between performance and

[1]  Rupert Ortner,et al.  How many people can control a motor imagery based BCI using common spatial patterns? , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[2]  Sergi Bermúdez i Badia,et al.  NeuRow: An Immersive VR Environment for Motor-Imagery Training with the Use of Brain-Computer Interfaces and Vibrotactile Feedback , 2016, PhyCS.

[3]  T. Ros,et al.  Tuning pathological brain oscillations with neurofeedback: a systems neuroscience framework , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Marian Poboroniuc,et al.  High Classification Accuracy of a Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface for Stroke Rehabilitation Training , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[5]  Jie Wang,et al.  Feature subset and time segment selection for the classification of EEG data based motor imagery , 2020, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  OpenViBE: An Open-Source Software Platform to Design, Test, and Use BrainComputer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]  Lin Lu,et al.  Neural activities classification of left and right finger gestures during motor execution and motor imagery , 2020 .

[9]  Febriliyan Samopa,et al.  Evaluating OpenBCI Spiderclaw V1 Headwear's Electrodes Placements for Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Motor Imagery Application , 2015 .

[10]  Jinchang Ren,et al.  EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Motor-Imagery: Techniques and Challenges , 2019, Sensors.

[11]  Sadasivan Puthusserypady,et al.  Review on motor imagery based BCI systems for upper limb post-stroke neurorehabilitation: From designing to application , 2020, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[12]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Jesús González,et al.  Deep learning for EEG-based Motor Imagery classification: Accuracy-cost trade-off , 2020, PloS one.

[14]  Athanasios Vourvopoulos,et al.  Using brain-computer interaction and multimodal virtual-reality for augmenting stroke neurorehabilitation , 2018 .

[15]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Nigel MacLennan,et al.  Assessment and Analysis , 2017 .

[17]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Graz-BCI: state of the art and clinical applications , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Minkyu Ahn,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[19]  Jennifer Boger,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Vibro-Tactile EEG Response and Its Implications in BCI Applications: A Comparison Between Older and Younger Populations , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  J. J. Zhang,et al.  Immediate and long-term effects of BCI-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. , 2017, Current opinion in biomedical engineering.

[23]  Patrícia Figueiredo,et al.  Efficacy and Brain Imaging Correlates of an Immersive Motor Imagery BCI-Driven VR System for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Clinical Case Report , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  High Theta and Low Alpha Powers May Be Indicative of BCI-Illiteracy in Motor Imagery , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  J. Millán,et al.  Brain‐computer interfaces for post‐stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta‐analysis , 2018, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[26]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Brain-Machine Interface in Chronic Stroke: Randomized Trial Long-Term Follow-up , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[27]  Doron Friedman,et al.  “Brain art: Brain-computer interfaces for artistic expression” , 2020, Brain-Computer Interfaces.

[28]  A. Al Mahmud,et al.  Exploring serious games for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review , 2020, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.