Maturation and connectivity of the visual cortex in monkey is altered by prenatal removal of retinal input

In several species, the peripheral input from the eyes partly determines the pattern of interconnections between the visual areas of the two cerebral hemispheres through the fibre tract termed the corpus callosum1–9. In the macaque monkey, the neurons projecting through the callosum are largely restricted to area 18 throughout ontogeny, whereas area 17 is characterized by few or no callosal projections10–12. Here, we show that suppressing the peripheral input by prenatal removal of the eyes leads to a marked reduction in the extent of area 17, resulting in a large shift in the position of the histologically identifiable boundary between the two areas. Even so, the boundary continues to separate an area rich with callosal connections (area 18) from one poor in such projections (area 17), indicating there is no effect on the callosal connectivity of area 17. In contrast, in area 18, eye removal results in many more neurons with callosal projections than in normal animals. The results suggest that the factors that determine the parcellation of cortical areas also specify their connectivity.

[1]  M. Wong-Riley Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry , 1979, Brain Research.

[2]  P. Rakic Specification of cerebral cortical areas. , 1988, Science.

[3]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Absence of interhemispheric connections of area 17 during development in the monkey , 1988, Nature.

[4]  D. Frost,et al.  Effects of visual experience on the maturation of the efferent system to the corpus callosum , 1979, Nature.

[5]  R. Rhoades,et al.  Neonatal enucleation induces an asymmetric pattern of visual callosal connections in hamsters , 1980, Brain Research.

[6]  R. Lund,et al.  The development of callosal projections in normal and one-eyed rats. , 1984, Brain research.

[7]  R. C. Van Sluyters,et al.  Callosal connections of the posterior neocortex in normal‐eyed, congenitally anophthalmic, and neonatally enucleated mice , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Additional factors influencing sensitivity in the tetramethyl benzidine method for horseradish peroxidase neurohistochemistry. , 1980, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[9]  L. Rothblat,et al.  Age-related changes in the distribution of visual callosal neurons following monocular enucleation in the rat , 1982, Brain Research.

[10]  Henry Kennedy,et al.  The maturational status of thalamocortical and callosal connections of visual areas V1 and V2 in the newborn monkey , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  Henry Kennedy,et al.  Functional implications of the anatomical organization of the callosal projections of visual areas V1 and V2 in the macaque monkey , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  R. Lund,et al.  Modification of visual callosal projections in rats , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J Bullier,et al.  Callosal connectivity of areas V1 and V2 in the newborn monkey , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  J Bullier,et al.  Organization of the callosal connections of visual areas v1 and v2 in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.