The effect of low frequency magnetic fields on the healing of the osteotomized rabbit radius.

The object of this experimental work was to evaluate the effect of a noninvasive method of electrical stimulation on the healing of freshly-created osteotomies of the rabbit radius. The apparatus consisted of a solid core electromagnet energized by a square wave unidirectional current. The magnetic field was pulsed transversely across the osteotomy site of the radius while the animal was confined to a restraining device 6 hours daily for 5 days per week. In one group of animals the influence of different pulse frequencies, using 0.1 Hz, 1 Hz, and 4 Hz, was evaluated, while the period of stimulation was kept constant at 2 weeks. In another group of animals, exposure was continued for 3 and 4 weeks while the pulse frequency was kept constant at 1 Hz. Histologic and radiologic comparison with control animals revealed that the initiation of the healing process can be accelerated in magnetic fields pulsed at 1 Hz, but that this effect is not maintained, and that the total period of time required for union is not significantly shortened. In view of these findings, this form of treatment is not recommended for clinical use in the treatment of recent fractures of long bones.

[1]  P. Wittebol Stimulation of non-epiphyseal bone growth , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[2]  A. Chamay,et al.  Bone changes due to pulses of direct electric microcurrent , 2004, Virchows Archiv A.

[3]  K. Piekarski,et al.  Osteogenetic stimulation by externally applied dc current. , 1978, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  C. Masureik,et al.  Preliminary clinical evaluation of the effect of small electrical currents on the healing of jaw fractures. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Clinical experiences with low intensity direct current stimulation of bone growth. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  C. Brighton,et al.  In vitro epiphyseal-plate growth in various constant electrical fields. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  L. Norton IN VIVO BONE GROWTH IN A CONTROLLED ELECTRIC FIELD * , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Stallard,et al.  MECHANISM OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF BONE FORMATION * , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  ACCELERATION OF FRACTURE REPAIR BY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS. A SURGICALLY NONINVASIVE METHOD , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  C. Brighton,et al.  The response of non-traumatized bone to direct current. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  Augmentation of Bone Repair by Inductively Coupled Electromagnetic Fields , 1974, Science.

[12]  R. R. Moore,et al.  Bone Growth in Organ Culture Modified by an Electric Field , 1972, Journal of dental research.

[13]  G. Cochran Experimental methods for stimulation of bone healing by means of electrical energy. , 1972, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[14]  D. Goldenberg,et al.  Electric enhancement of bone healing. , 1972, Science.

[15]  C. Brighton,et al.  Healing of nonunion of the medial malleolus by means of direct current: a case report. , 1971, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  C. Brighton,et al.  Stimulation of fracture healing by direct current in the rabbit fibula. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  C. Brighton,et al.  Bone reaction to varying amounts of direct current. , 1970, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[18]  W. Hoover,et al.  The effect of direct current on bone. , 1968, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  Effects of Electric Currents on Bone In Vivo , 1964, Nature.

[20]  T. Cieszynski STUDIES ON THE REGENERATION OF OSSAL TISSUE. III. INFLUENCE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ELECTRICITY UPON CALLUS FORMATION IN HUMANS. , 1964, Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis.