Analysis of runaway electron discharge formation during Joint European Torus plasma start-up

Joint European Torus (JET) plasma initiations that form a significant quantity of runaway electrons have been studied. It is shown that there is no direct relationship between the prefill pressure and breakdown electric field and signs of runaway electrons during the plasma initiation. Runaway electron generation is determined by the electric field and density development at and after burn-through. A clear criterion of density and electric field at one given point in time, which would ensure the avoidance of runaway electron generation, cannot be determined, because the timescales for the formation of runaway electrons and for the dynamics of the density differ significantly. Moreover, the formation process can be reversed, reducing the influence of runaway electrons on the discharge. Ensuring a high enough density will reduce the likelihood that runaway electron discharges are formed. It is also found that at JET the electric field often exceeds the critical electric field during the early stages of the current ramp-up phase, even when no signs of runaway electrons are present. Expected runaway current dynamics have been analysed using the discharge circuit equation. The comparison of the expected runaway electron current dynamics shows it to be significantly slower compared to theoretical expectations in the presence of a hot and dense thermal background plasma. This could be explained by an enhanced critical electric field and/or a reduced confinement of runaway electrons. The latter is shown to be affected by bursts of magnetohydrodynamic activity that are characteristic during the current ramp-up. The development of discharges in which the current is fully carried by runaway electrons happens on a slow timescale of several seconds, limited by the available flux. Such timescales are sufficient for improved active control of these events, avoiding runaway currents at plasma initiation exceeding values at which they could damage in-vessel components. The results provide insight into the improvement and interpretation of self-consistent modelling of runaway electron generation during the start-up of International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor discharges.

[1]  Y. Gribov,et al.  ITER breakdown and plasma initiation revisited , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[2]  P. Aleynikov,et al.  Physics of runaway electrons in tokamaks , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[3]  A. Boozer,et al.  Kink instabilities of the post-disruption runaway electron beam at low safety factor , 2019, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

[4]  P. Aleynikov,et al.  Generation of runaway electrons during the thermal quench in tokamaks , 2017 .

[5]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  On the measurement of the threshold electric field for runaway electron generation in the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade , 2016 .

[6]  J. Contributors,et al.  Melt damage to the JET ITER-like Wall and divertor , 2016 .

[7]  N. W. Eidietis,et al.  Disruptions in ITER and strategies for their control and mitigation , 2015 .

[8]  J. Decker,et al.  Effective critical electric field for runaway-electron generation. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[9]  Ftu,et al.  Inter-machine comparison of the termination phase and energy conversion in tokamak disruptions with runaway current plateau formation and implications for ITER , 2014 .

[10]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  An ITPA joint experiment to study runaway electron generation and suppression , 2014 .

[11]  J. Wesley,et al.  Growth and decay of runaway electrons above the critical electric field under quiescent conditions , 2014 .

[12]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Control and dissipation of runaway electron beams created during rapid shutdown experiments in DIII-D , 2013 .

[13]  D. Mueller.  The physics of tokamak start-upa) , 2013 .

[14]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Characterisation of plasma breakdown at JET with a carbon and ITER-like wall , 2013 .

[15]  M. N. A. Beurskens,et al.  JET ITER-like wall—overview and experimental programme , 2011 .

[16]  J. R. Martin-Solis,et al.  Experimental observation of increased threshold electric field for runaway generation due to synchrotron radiation losses in the FTU Tokamak. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[17]  Jose Ramon Martin-Solis,et al.  Dynamics of high energy runaway electrons in the Frascati Tokamak Upgrade , 2003 .

[18]  M. Rosenbluth,et al.  Theory for avalanche of runaway electrons in tokamaks , 1997 .

[19]  Raul Sanchez,et al.  Runaway electron measurements in the JET tokamak , 1996 .

[20]  C. D. Warrick,et al.  ECRH-assisted start-up in ITER , 1996 .

[21]  Jaspers,et al.  Islands of runaway electrons in the TEXTOR tokamak and relation to transport in a stochastic field. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[22]  G. Mank,et al.  Experimental investigation of runaway electron generation in TEXTOR , 1993 .

[23]  E. A. Lazarus,et al.  Low voltage Ohmic and electron cyclotron heating assisted startup in DIII-D , 1991 .

[24]  A. H. Morton,et al.  Runaway electrons and rational-q surfaces in a tokamak , 1983 .

[25]  H. Knoepfel,et al.  Runaway electrons in toroidal discharges , 1979 .

[26]  J. W. Connor,et al.  Relativistic limitations on runaway electrons , 1975 .

[27]  H. Dreicer,et al.  Electron and Ion Runaway in a Fully Ionized Gas. I , 1959 .

[28]  Ryuji Yoshino,et al.  Low electric field plasma-current start-up in JT-60U , 1997 .