The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian

Recent studies by Berent and Perfetti (1995) and Lee, Rayner, and Pollatsek (2001) have shown a processing priority of consonants over vowels in tasks like backward masking and reading, respectively. One possible explanation for this advantage of consonants is in terms of the specific characteristics of the English spelling (i.e., a great inconsistency in the spelling-sound relations for vowels), and therefore is not predicted for a language, like Italian, with a transparent orthography. The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the consonant advantage in Italian with the backward masking paradigm. The first two experiments, with a perceptual identification and a naming task, showed a masking reduction effect for masks sharing vowels with the target at the shortest SOAs, in addition to a pseudo-homophone advantage as compared to the control condition. In the third experiment, where a lexical decision task was used, the advantage of the mask sharing vowels disappeared. The fourth experiment was a replication of Experiment 1 with different materials. Overall, the results suggest that the advantage of consonants can only be found in English, whereas in Italian, for which the computation of phonology of vowels and consonants is similar, no effect is apparent. Thus, the processing priority for consonants seems to depend on the inconsistencies of vowel phonology in English.

[1]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation , 2006 .

[2]  M. Zorzi,et al.  VOWELS IN THE BUFFER: A CASE STUDY OF ACQUIRED DYSGRAPHIA WITH SELECTIVE VOWEL SUBSTITUTIONS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: Evidence from the fast priming paradigm , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  J. Ziegler,et al.  On the nature of phonological assembly: Evidence from backward masking , 2002 .

[5]  K. Rayner,et al.  The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading , 2001 .

[6]  M. Zorzi.  Serial processing in reading aloud: no challenge for a parallel model. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  An Evaluation of the Two-Cycles Model of Phonology Assembly☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[8]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud , 1999 .

[9]  T. Carr,et al.  Concurrent task demands and individual differences in the architecture of reading: Discriminating artifacts from real McCoys , 1998 .

[10]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Lupker,et al.  Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines? , 1997 .

[13]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[14]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Phonological Information Provides Early Sources of Constraint in the Processing of Letter Strings , 1995 .

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  J Grainger,et al.  Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Effects of Masked Homophone Primes , 1994 .

[20]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[21]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Masked Non-Word Priming , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  S. Monsell,et al.  Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound : Strategic anticipation of lexical status , 1992 .

[23]  R. Cubelli.  A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia , 1991, Nature.

[24]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[25]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .

[26]  Chris Davis,et al.  The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: interference effects from a masked prime , 1991 .

[27]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[28]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? , 1988 .

[29]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[31]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[32]  D. Besner,et al.  Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. , 1987 .

[33]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[34]  M. Adams.  What good is orthographic redundancy , 1980 .

[35]  G. Underwood.  Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[36]  P. Naish.  The Effects of Graphemic and Phonemic Similarity between Targets and Masks in a Backward Visual Masking Paradigm , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[38]  Lucia Colombo,et al.  The Assembly of Phonology in Italian and English: Consonants and Vowels , 2000 .

[39]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Commentary on Section 3 – Dual Routes from Print to Speech and Dual Routes from Print to Meaning: Some Theoretical Issues , 2000 .

[40]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[42]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English , 1995 .

[43]  J. Vizmuller-Zocco,et al.  Lessico di frequenza dell'italiano parlato , 1994 .

[44]  L. Colombo.  Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation , 1992 .

[45]  M. Daneman,et al.  Phonological recoding in silent reading , 1991 .

[46]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition , 1991 .

[47]  G. V. van Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[48]  Derek Besner,et al.  The assembly of phonology in oral reading: A new model. , 1987 .

[49]  Diana Archangeli,et al.  Yokuts harmony: evidence for doplanar representation in nonlinear phonology , 1985 .

[50]  M. Coltheart.  Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[51]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .