Functional integration of the posterior superior temporal sulcus correlates with facial expression recognition

Face perception is essential for daily and social activities. Neuroimaging studies have revealed a distributed face network (FN) consisting of multiple regions that exhibit preferential responses to invariant or changeable facial information. However, our understanding about how these regions work collaboratively to facilitate facial information processing is limited. Here, we focused on changeable facial information processing, and investigated how the functional integration of the FN is related to the performance of facial expression recognition. To do so, we first defined the FN as voxels that responded more strongly to faces than objects, and then used a voxel‐based global brain connectivity method based on resting‐state fMRI to characterize the within‐network connectivity (WNC) of each voxel in the FN. By relating the WNC and performance in the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test across participants, we found that individuals with stronger WNC in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (rpSTS) were better at recognizing facial expressions. Further, the resting‐state functional connectivity (FC) between the rpSTS and right occipital face area (rOFA), early visual cortex (EVC), and bilateral STS were positively correlated with the ability of facial expression recognition, and the FCs of EVC‐pSTS and OFA‐pSTS contributed independently to facial expression recognition. In short, our study highlights the behavioral significance of intrinsic functional integration of the FN in facial expression processing, and provides evidence for the hub‐like role of the rpSTS for facial expression recognition. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1930–1940, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Task-dependent organization of brain regions active during rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Network Interactions Explain Sensitivity to Dynamic Faces in the Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Resting-State Neural Activity across Face-Selective Cortical Regions Is Behaviorally Relevant , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Edwin M. Robertson,et al.  The Resting Human Brain and Motor Learning , 2009, Current Biology.

[8]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Combined TMS and fMRI Reveal Dissociable Cortical Pathways for Dynamic and Static Face Perception , 2014, Current Biology.

[9]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  D. Schacter,et al.  Correlated low-frequency BOLD fluctuations in the resting human brain are modulated by recent experience in category-preferential visual regions. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[15]  R. Saxe.  Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Alex Martin,et al.  Two distinct forms of functional lateralization in the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Learning sculpts the spontaneous activity of the resting human brain , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  R. Matthew Hutchison,et al.  Resting-state fMRI reveals functional connectivity between face-selective perirhinal cortex and the fusiform face area related to face inversion , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  Siyuan Hu,et al.  Different neural pathways linking personality traits and eudaimonic well-being: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2015, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Probabilistic atlases for face and biological motion perception: An analysis of their reliability and overlap , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Knott.  The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .

[23]  Michael Henry Tessler,et al.  Functional connectivity constrains the category‐related organization of human ventral occipitotemporal cortex , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Individual Differences in Impulsivity Predict Head Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  Carl Senior,et al.  Dynamic Facial Expressions Evoke Distinct Activation in the Face Perception Network: A Connectivity Analysis Study , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Jia Liu,et al.  The Hierarchical Brain Network for Face Recognition , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  Xu Wang,et al.  Quantifying interindividual variability and asymmetry of face-selective regions: A probabilistic functional atlas , 2015, NeuroImage.

[29]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Facial expression and gaze-direction in human superior temporal sulcus , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  David Pitcher,et al.  Facial Expression Recognition Takes Longer in the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus than in the Occipital Face Area , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Pitcher,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia with spared within-class object recognition but impaired recognition of degraded basic-level objects , 2011, Cognitive Neuropsychology.

[33]  T. Andrews,et al.  Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  P. Salovey,et al.  Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. , 2003, Emotion.

[35]  Fernand Meyer,et al.  Topographic distance and watershed lines , 1994, Signal Process..

[36]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  S. Petersen,et al.  The maturing architecture of the brain's default network , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Let’s face it: It’s a cortical network , 2008, NeuroImage.

[40]  Jia Liu,et al.  Neural decoding reveals impaired face configural processing in the right fusiform face area of individuals with developmental prosopagnosia. , 2015, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  Ruosi Wang,et al.  Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability , 2012, Psychological science.

[42]  Xu Wang,et al.  Neural correlates of the happy life: The amplitude of spontaneous low frequency fluctuations predicts subjective well-being , 2015, NeuroImage.

[43]  Frederic Dick,et al.  Developmental Changes in Effective Connectivity in the Emerging Core Face Network , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[45]  Xiaobin Dang,et al.  Examining gray matter structures associated with individual differences in global life satisfaction in a large sample of young adults. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[46]  Zonglei Zhen,et al.  Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Yu Sun Chung,et al.  A meta-analysis of mentalizing impairments in adults with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. , 2014, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[49]  X. Wang,et al.  The network property of the thalamus in the default mode network is correlated with trait mindfulness , 2014, Neuroscience.

[50]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al.  Face-Specific Resting Functional Connectivity between the Fusiform Gyrus and Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  Nathalie Boddaert,et al.  Autism, the superior temporal sulcus and social perception , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[53]  Xueting Li,et al.  Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5‐HTTLPR) influences trait anxiety by modulating the functional connectivity between the amygdala and insula in Han Chinese males , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[54]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Develop from a “Local to Distributed” Organization , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Jie Tian,et al.  Intrinsically organized network for face perception during the resting state , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[58]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Working memory‐related changes in functional connectivity persist beyond task disengagement , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[59]  S. Petersen,et al.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[61]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[62]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  K. Pelphrey,et al.  An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[64]  A. Calder.  Does Facial Identity and Facial Expression Recognition Involve Separate Visual Routes , 2011 .

[65]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.