BioPlex™ 2200 multiplexed system: Simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Background. Antibodies for double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and chromatin represent specific markers of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Aims. (1) To evaluate the analytical performance of a multiplexed bead assay (BioPlex™ 2200) for the simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies, (2) to compare the results for anti-dsDNA with those obtained using Farr assay, and (3) to analyze the clinical relevance of these antibodies when applied to the follow-up of SLE patients with active nephritis. Patients and methods. Hundred and five clinically characterized SLE patients and 96 healthy blood donors sera were analyzed by BioPlex™ 2200. Results. Prevalence of these antibodies was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in SLE patients than in controls (68 and 70% for anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin, vs. 1% for both anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin, respectively). If you consider a sample positive if either anti-dsDNA and/or anti-chromatin is positive, then the prevalence of these antibodies reached 78% (82/105) in SLE patients. For anti-dsDNA measurements, the kappa coefficient was 0.59 between BioPlex™ 2200 and Farr assay. Comparison between SLE patients with and without nephritis in a follow-up study showed that patients with active nephritis were associated with an increase of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin levels and a reduction of CH50, whereas no variation of antibody levels was observed in SLE patients without nephritis. Conclusion. Our results demonstrated a benefit of simultaneously measuring anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin in SLE patients. The BioPlex™ 2200 achieved good analytical performances and proved to be a useful method for monitoring and diagnosing SLE.

[1]  Lee Hebert,et al.  The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[2]  J F Fries,et al.  The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1982, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[4]  M. López-Hoyos,et al.  Clinical disease activity and titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies measured by an automated immunofluorescence assay in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus , 2005, Lupus.

[5]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  The Homogeneous Multiplexed System-a New Method for Autoantibody Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus , 2005, Clinical & developmental immunology.

[6]  J. Yagüe,et al.  Hypocomplementemia in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary antiphospholipid syndrome: prevalence and clinical significance in 667 patients , 2004, Lupus.

[7]  C. Dostál,et al.  Prevalence of Antinucleosome Antibodies by Enzyme‐Linked Immunosorbent Assays in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Autoimmune Systemic Diseases , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  B. Namjou,et al.  Genetics of clinical expression in SLE , 2007, Autoimmunity.

[9]  O. Rekvig,et al.  Lupus nephritis: the central role of nucleosomes revealed. , 2008, The American journal of pathology.

[10]  Marielle Sanmarco,et al.  Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen for the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies and Comparison with Conventional Methods , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  V. Nassonova,et al.  Current causes of death in systemic lupus erythematosus in Europe, 2000—2004: relation to disease activity and damage accrual , 2007, Lupus.

[12]  D. Isenberg,et al.  Fifty years of anti-ds DNA antibodies: are we approaching journey's end? , 2007, Rheumatology.

[13]  M. Fritzler,et al.  Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA? , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology.

[14]  S. Eiam-Ong,et al.  Correlations between antinucleosome antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, C3, C4, and clinical activity in lupus patients. , 2006, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[15]  S. Barr,et al.  Autoantibodies in lupus nephritis patients requiring renal transplantation , 2007, Lupus.

[16]  B. Hahn Antibodies to DNA. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Y. Genç,et al.  Antinucleosome Antibodies and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  R. Cervera,et al.  1982 Revised Criteria for Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus — Ten Years Later , 1993, Lupus.

[19]  Renato Tozzoli,et al.  Recent advances in diagnostic technologies and their impact in autoimmune diseases. , 2007, Autoimmunity reviews.

[20]  A. Tincani,et al.  Anti-DNA antibodies: a diagnostic and prognostic tool for systemic lupus erythematosus? , 2005, Autoimmunity.

[21]  J. Bach,et al.  Diagnostic value of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the assessment of disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study comparing anti-nucleosome with anti-dsDNA antibodies. , 2006, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  Evaluation of the BioPlex™ 2200 ANA Screen: Analysis of 510 Healthy Subjects: Incidence of Natural/Predictive Autoantibodies , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  H. Masmoudi,et al.  Clinical significance of antinucleosome antibodies in Tunisian systemic lupus erythematosus patients , 2005, Clinical Rheumatology.